Talk:Kuromido

Japan: Science & technology Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:13, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Science and technology task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Metalworking

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hi all,

Per MOS the appropriate transliteration of should be "Kuromidō". According to my Nelson, 銅 is Modern Reader's Japanese-English Character Dictionary character 4853, Tōyō #1948, and its on-yomi in Hepburn is dō.

Of more concern is that Japanese Wikipedia doesn't have an article for Kuromido aka Kuromidō.
There's a plethora of Ghits for both Kuromido and 黒味銅 but none would appear to be reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
Moreover, there are but three and those trivial in the technical sense hits on Google Scholar in English, and similarly three trivial hits on Google Scholar in Japanese.
I'm not arguing that the article should be WP:PROD'd or WP:AfD'd - this is simply a rationale for adding tags. Wiser heads than mine, etc, etc.

--Shirt58 (talk) 12:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]