Talk:Kuranda Scenic Railway

Australia: Queensland / Transport Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Kuranda Scenic Railway is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Start‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article Confusion

This article confuses the business group of QR, Kuranda Scenic Railway, with the railway line that goes from Cairns to Kuranda. I propose that the two be separated with information about the company staying here and information about the railway moving to a new article - Kuranda Range Railway. Mkfenn (talk) 03:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image gallery

There seems to be a persistent misperception on one user's part as to the appropriateness of an image gallery in an article. Actually, it's just fine to have one of these. The policy is actually against articles that are nothing but an image gallery. Enjoy. Kelisi (talk) 21:22, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We also discourage galleries of images which are just random collections or provide no extra knowledge. This gallery shows the pretty mountain scenery, something already understood from the article text. We know there are bridges and waterfalls along the railway. Photos of people waiting at a station or the roof of a station don't provide any knowledge which would make the gallery legitimate. I understand how to use galleries, for example, on the Australian residential architectural styles, where the photos have been selected to show specific design features. I can't see how these photos have been carefully selected, except to say look at the lovely railway. It would be better to have one or two photos of the train instead and if the article expands add some more then. In the meantime the commons link at the bottom is suffice, however I am not going to remove it again. - Shiftchange (talk) 01:35, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kuranda Scenic Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070212234431/http://www.cairnsmuseum.org.au/rail.htm to http://www.cairnsmuseum.org.au/rail.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]