Talk:Kungoni

Why does anybody wants to delete this site to instead give nearly no information about the topic the site is talking all about. The text is not in an advertisal language anymore and the information are safe. There is no need to make an edit war out of this site. sincerly

Sorry, but if you want this article to stay it has to be written neutrally, without such obviously promotional statements as "has reached a high level and enjoys an excellent reputation all over the world", "grew stronger and stronger", "enjoys a good reputation" etc., and it needs to be based on independent reliable sources such as the ones that you persist in removing from the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay i fixed some expressions. I`m sorry for deleting your sources im not used to write articles like this it was not on purpose. The information i gave are save. I stay nearby the Center and know it pretty well, to find independent sources in the Internet is not that easy but i could look it up in traveller guides. The Center is mentioned in everyone of them that deal with malawi. Another thing is: why should i lie about the Centre? When you led me put the article I will add some sources in the following days but i need time to search for them. The most important source i have are my eyes and ears. sincerly —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.103.77.181 (talk) 07:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the very beginning of WP:V - "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—what counts is whether readers can verify that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true." While I don't doubt your honesty, this encyclopedia relies on published secondary sources, not on eyewitness accounts. - Biruitorul ^Talk 23:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kungoni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]