Talk:Kumiki Gibson

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Notable

I've tagged the article as non-notable. Please at least tell us in the opening sentence what she is notable for. Thanks. Steve Dufour (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the notability has not been clearly stated in the opening sentence, but I suppose that there is some notability given, because a) she served in the american government c) she also served in several local government organisations c) she has had a lot of newspaper reports written about her. Unfortunatelly, I'm not at all an expert on this subject, I was merelly attracted to this article due to an edit-war. --PaterMcFly (talk) 21:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She might be notable. However what the article does now is just list some jobs she has done, with some criticism and praise thrown in. There is no overall story about her. Steve Dufour (talk) 22:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, but as I said, I'm probably the wrong guy to fix this. Let's maybe ask those who started the edit-war previously in this article? --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:07, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

This article has been the target of a long going Edit-War without any discussion at all. This is not acceptable. Next time someone is doing an uncommented or poorly commented change, I'll request a block on the page to get the issues discussed here. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, this shall be it now. The involved users have both got a final warning, next time such an unconstructive edit is made, there will be consequences.

Please, tell us what's going on here and why you're doing this edit-warring here. --PaterMcFly (talk) 18:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

Please block any edits to this page by anyone who has not disputed a block, OR delete the page entirely. After you unblocked & the page was updated (o to remove the libelous and inaccurate statements), someone revised to include the libelous statements. Please block him/her from any further edits OR just remove the page entirely for lack of notability (see above). If the page remains, it cannot be used to perpetuate libelous statements and must be accurate and current. Thank you. 08:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)truthfuldata08:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Truthful data (talk)

I've nominated the article for deletion. Because there's really little visible notability, all this edit-warring is really not worth it. --PaterMcFly (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kumiki Gibson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]