Talk:Kumbakonam/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 20:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

• Two images of Mahamaham are not needed. Also, the infobox image should have a contemporary image of Kumbakonam, say that the most important monument/temple. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 03:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

There are good pictures with suitable licenses on flickr too: [1]. Let me know if specific temple images are needed. I will search flickr. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, there are images with suitable licenses. But I would not consider them "good". Most of the photos are of the Sarangapani temple, Kumbeshwarar temple and the few other main temples. The rest are simply captioned "friendly people from kumbakonam", "Kumbakonam colourful streets", or "Kumbakonam nice architecture". I am not able to make out what places they depict.-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 14:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive, well-referenced, well-illustrated article

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well illustrated.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding it GA-status - well deserved. Pyrotec (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! :-)-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 14:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC)