Talk:Kumari (goddess)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kumari (goddess) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Selection process

Followong this paragraph:

"Once the priests have chosen a candidate, she must undergo yet more rigorous tests to ensure that she indeed possesses the qualities necessary to be the living vessel of Durga. Her greatest test comes during the Hindu festival of Dashain. On the kalratri, or 'black night', 108 buffaloes and goats are sacrificed to the god Kali. The young candidate is taken into the Taleju temple and released into the courtyard, where the severed heads of the animals are illuminated by candlelight and masked men are dancing about. If the candidate truly possesses the qualities of Taleju, she shows no fear during this experience. If she does not, another candidate is brought in to attempt the same thing."

there was formerly this statement:

"This is actually a series of commonly-repeated, false statements. If you read the ex-Royal Kumari's autobiography, called "From Goddess to Mortal" (2005), you'll see that a) this has nothing to do with the selection process at all, but is a ritual the Royal Kumari goes through each year b) there aren't men dancing around in masks trying to scare here and c) there aren't 108 heads... at most a dozen or so. She also discusses in the book how the physical examination (discussed in the preceeding paragraph) is not very intimate or rigorous."

This is contradictory, the contributor should have either placed the comment here or amended the text to make it consistent.82.170.18.218 15:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is obvious disagreement in this section, so I'm labeling it as disputed until someone can sort it out. I'm also editing the second half of the paragraph starting with "Once the priests have chosen a candidate..." to conform to encyclopedic style guidelines, and splitting the dispute into a separate paragraph. - C4Diesel, 15:19, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Teeth

In addition to this, her hair and eyes should be very black, she should have dainty hands and feet, small and well-recessed sexual organs and a set of forty teeth.

Forty teeth is double what most young girls have. I doubt any kid could have 40 teeth. Can someone confirm this is the correct number? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.6.78.69 (talk) 23:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Copied?

Much of the text, especially about Kumari selection and life after being the Kumari, looks copied from http://kumari.puellula.com/Main.html this site. Can anyone verify which came first? Shouriki 04:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That site doesn't actually exist anymore. The other site, though, http://www.visitnepal.com/nepal_information/kumari.php is the first site linked to from this page, and a lot of what you mention from those sections looks copied word-for-word from that page. 12:00, 10 October 2008 (EST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.96.34.235 (talk)

Kumari of Bhaktapur looses status?

As reported by the AP, the Kumari of Bhaktapur (the one shown in the picture of this page) was stripped of her status as a Kumari because she traveled outside of Nepal, which she was supposedly no allowed to do. Could anyone else confirm this, and if so, then I think it should be noted in the article. The AP article can be found here: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NEPAL_LIVING_GODDESS?SITE=ORBAK&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Di 69.27.229.11 16:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is also an article from Yahoo News: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070703/ap_on_re_as/nepal_living_goddess

It states that Sajani Shakya did have "her status revoked because she broke with tradition by leaving the country"

- In BBC News today, it was reported that, because she is willing to be "cleansed" she will retain her status as Kumari.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6907007.stm

Far too PC

This page is way to politically correct, the kumari are tools to reinforce the monarchy. Looks like this is about to be a thing of the past what with the revolution and all. --Calibas 02:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you care why?

Well, let's see. First, I want to improve Wikipedia. Secondly, I fully support to revolution in Nepal, which is against the king and the Kumari. I could list plenty of other reasons too but I'm not going to. Does your flippant remark have a point? --Calibas 00:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone cite any information that indicates the Kumari's relationship with the monarchy? The article says that she "confirms the king's legitimacy every year of her divinity," but based on the other content of the article I read nothing else about some controversy or objection associated with the Kumari system as a tool of past kings. Bluerasberry (talk) 19:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The List

The list of Kumari is, presumably, of those who were Royal Kumari (since the last name on it matches the name referenced in the opening paragraph as the present Royal Kumari). It needs a heading to make that clear, since there are, as noted, several different Kumari. Irish Melkite 05:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC) Yes of course, this list of Royal Kumari only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mizman619 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kumari Fulbright

I've been searching regarding Kumari Fulbright.

Should this encyclopædia attest to deity, or even diet? I cannot divine why wiki would endorse "...is a living goddess in,..."

Oh, kum, on.

[[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. ~~ Thank You. -]] 04:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

image of the Kumari

If you wish to see an optimum, but copyrighted image of the Kumar please have a look at:

http://www.trekearth.com/gallery/photo835956.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.92.197.59 (talk) 12:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

which god

here it says they are beleved to be a reincarnation of teleju but i thought it was kali i don't really have a sorce but i saw some news on one of theese she did something and they said she was a reincarnation of kali which is it i can't find it anywere else on the internet--Charlieh7337 (talk) 20:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teleju is a form of Kali. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.142.99.56 (talk) 07:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teleju (Nepali) is actually the goddess Durga (Hindi). Someone should add this to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.59.171.82 (talk) 17:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Needed

Kumari, or Kumari Devi, is the tradition of worshipping young pre-pubescent girls as manifestations of the divine female energy or devi in Indian subcontinental countries 'Do you have citation for other contries except Nepal' . Kumari literally means virgin in Sanskrit, Nepali and some Indian languages and is a name of the goddess Durga as a child.

In this article all the story about Kumari is from Nepal , but Nepal country is specifically mentioned only in the latter part of the article .The Kumari culture is there in SA but is there any living "Kumari Goddess" in other countries outside Nepal even outside Kathmandu Valley ? Please provide respectful information not misguiding people saying South Asia ..Thanks

saroj (talk) 14:47, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhism ?

Could it be made specific what kind of Buddhism ? Kumari Goddess Tradition is practiced by only the Bajrayan sect of the Buddhism which is mostly practiced in Nepal, Tibet and India, There are different sects in Buddhism like Mahayan, Bajrayan, Heenyan and more . We would appreciate if you could be more specific ....

saroj (talk) 14:57, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kumari Devi Nepal.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Kumari Devi Nepal.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kumari Devi Nepal.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Current Kumari

The list says Matina Shakya stopped being Kumari in 2010 when Samita Bajracharya became Kumari, but the press still refers to Matina Shakya as royal Kumari and says Samita Bajracharya was Kumari of Patan. I don't really know how this works; can anyone advise? Ansat (talk) 02:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kumari (goddess). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy/Scriptures

The first part of this section looks like somebody saw some problems with the article and put their complaints in the article itself, rather than the talk page, where they belong. The claims made in this portion of the section are also not cited. I know this portion was intended to improve the article, but it makes the article self-contradicting and informal. Reversespaghetti (talk) 05:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

100% true. Reads as a blog comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.90.26.8 (talk) 13:58, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency between lede and tables.

The lede mentions Unika Bajracharya was selected in April 2014 as the Kumari of Patan and makes it sound as if she's the current one. However, the table listing the Kumaris of Patan mentions Yumika Bajracharya selected in 2014 instead, and gives a 2018 date for the end of her reign, with Nihira Bajracharya listed as the current serving Kumari. What is it? Is "Yumika" an alternative spelling for "Unika"? How does this work? Not A Superhero (talk) 07:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nepali book

Kumari nach ko bera mein in nepali 2400:1A00:B010:9EF8:4979:562B:CEF6:6509 (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Modern developments and adult kumari

Perhaps this from the New York Times includes material tat should be included

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/15/world/asia/nepal-kumari-living-goddess.html

Update required

Since Nepal is no longer a kingdom, references to the king are out-of-date. I am not able to undertake such a major cleanup, sorry! Awien (talk) 16:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]