Talk:Kumaran Asan

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Mid-importance).

Mahakavi

I read somewhere that Asan became a mahakavi without writing a Mahakavyam (Mahakaavyamezhuthaathe Mahaakaviyaaya eka kavi...).If this is true,then some changes have to be made in the article.I am not sure.--Sahodaran 04:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

>> I read somewhere that Asan became a mahakavi without writing a Mahakavyam

Same here. This is what I have I have learned in school. Tintin 12:46, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of Kumaran Asan?

I own the book (Asante Padyakrthikal) cited at the end of this article. The back cover includes a picture (painting?) of Kumaran Asan, sitting in a dark background with leaves of various colors. Is it OK by Wikipedia standards to take a picture of the back cover? Or would that violate the book's copyright or something?--Kuaichik 02:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. I'll check with someone else. The bookcover is allowed only in a discussion about the book. But photos which are more than 70 years old are in public domain, but not sure whether it applies to those which appear in a book. Tintin (talk) 05:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added two pictures. Found 'em through good ol' Google.-- thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK}07:44, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shadaaa! Now why didn't I ever think of that??? :) Once again, Deepusaarre, thank you very much!--Kuaichik 15:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

np. ;-) -- thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK}12:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Credited for being the only Mahakavi who didn't write a Mahakavyum.

I have often read P. Kunujiraman Nair being referred to as 'Mahakavi P.'. He hasn't written any Mahakavyas, has he ? There could be such others too.

I am deleting this line now. See this news report about the 'Mahakavi P Kunjiraman Nair Award'. There are a few others like Akkitham who have also been called Mahakavis. Tintin (talk) 06:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The crowning achievement of Kumaran Asan was his Buddha Charitha

Is there any uniformity of opinion that this is his finest work ? Tintin (talk) 05:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added a "citation required tag" Tintin (talk) 06:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Tintin! I don't know whether Sribuddhacharitham was Kumaran Asan's "finest" work, but it certainly looks like it was his longest. In Asante Padyakrthikal, it's 143 pages long!

(Certainly if I hold all the pages of each poem together, Sri Buddha Charitham is the thickest, and please do not make me count the number of verses!!) :)

The only other epic poem Asan wrote was the Balaramayanam, which is only 41 pages. --Kuaichik 11:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How big is Asante Padyakrthikal ? Tintin (talk) 14:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty big. 904 pages in all (including commentary). It includes all of Kumaran Asan's works, as far as I know. Certainly it includes all of the poems listed on this page. --Kuaichik 02:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copied???

I have a hunch that much of the information here is copied from the website http://www.geocities.com/guruforum/kumaranasan.htm. I suppose I could be wrong; maybe the website owner actually copied from this article and then forgot to attribute some of the information properly. All I know for sure is that many of the sentences in this article (including the controversial one concerning the Sreebuddhacharitham) are (almost) exactly the same as those in the above-mentioned website. --Kuaichik 02:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)asdsafas[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kumaran Asan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130407065701/http://www.kerala.gov.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3957&Itemid=3142 to http://www.kerala.gov.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3957&Itemid=3142

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]