Talk:Kulothunga II

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tamil civilization, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tamil civilizationWikipedia:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTemplate:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTamil civilization articles

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: Tamil Nadu / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Please replace the name 'Chola' (சோள) that means the name of an eatable grain, with 'Chozha' (சோழ) which means the name of a king and/or his dynasty.Helppublic (talk) 10:24, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit needed

For a start "Vikrama Chola made his heir apparent and coregent" in English needs an explicit object (unlike some languages where the likes of "him" can be implicit). --SilasW 13:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A few of the other writing errors:
1. "that now primarily" needs a verb in or near it (maybe lifted from "Chola Dynasty").
2. I guess “princes” should be “princess”
3. “was perhaps his most favourite” WP does not report such uncertainties (unless essential e.g. to explain some action otherwise inexplicable).
4. “was perhaps his most favourite”, Should not “favourite” be unqualified?
5. “poeting” exists only as a twee nonce word.
6. “We know of the names..” No we do not. We may know the names (which in fact then follow).
7. “We know of the names..” should be expressed impersonally; “The names of…”
8. The linked article ‘’Chola Dynasty’’ has much of the wording of this. The overlap should be cut.--SilasW 14:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are Historic Tamil Names in Sanskrit / Devanagiri?

It should be Kulothunga Cholan, not Kulothunga Chola (without the N at the back). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arul20 (talk • contribs) 02:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]