Talk:Kuala Langat North Forest Reserve

A fact from Kuala Langat North Forest Reserve appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 April 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Selangor State Executive Council degazetted most of the Kuala Langat North Forest Reserve, despite the legislative assembly having unanimously voted to preserve it?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kuala Langat North Forest Reserve.

Wikipedia

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Kuala Langat North Forest Reserve be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Selangor State Executive Council degazetted most of the Kuala Langat North Forest Reserve, despite the Legislative Assembly having unanimously voted to preserve it? Source: [1]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hockley Pendant
- Comment: Hook wording tweaks welcome!

Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk). Self-nominated at 15:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, I'm going to do a QPQ on this article. dawnleelynn^(talk) 19:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC) *[reply]
Hi, I believe you need to do your QPQ too? Or do you have a free one. How do I check? dawnleelynn^(talk) 20:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
General eligibility:
New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Hi dawnleelynn, the QPQ is above: "Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hockley Pendant". As a side note please notify on the talkpage when there is a review needing attention, I almost missed this on the watchlist! CMD (talk) 01:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chipmunkdavis. Yes, I knew in the beginning there was a QPQ; I can't say why I got confused. Also knew I should have left a talk page message. I think I'm trying to juggle too much. Sorry about that! Sorry for changing cancelled too. I don't usually work in articles that have other language considerations, but I'm trying to do the older DYKs that have been waiting longer. Also, please don't change the template youself. Thanks! dawnleelynn^(talk) 03:12, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chipmunkdavis Hi again, this QPQ has passed. Great hook, impeccable sources, lovely prose, just great job all around! A pleasure to review. dawnleelynn^(talk) 03:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate the feedback. Which template did I change? CMD (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chipmunkdavis The template used to review the QPQ. I don't recall changing it but I must have. Nevermind. Hopefully, I'll get better at QPQs again. Thanks for your patience. I'm still happy to get this done in a short amount of time. 14:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC)dawnleelynn^(talk)

To T:DYK/P6