Jump to content

Talk:Kropyvnytskyi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Renamed

[edit]

Today, 14 july 2016 Supreme Council of Ukraine renamed city into Kropyvnyts'kiy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.62.231.200 (talk) 10:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Guys, help to upload the skyline into the infobox correctly :-/ --Querist 08:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

Everyone still calls it Kirovograd. Everyone but Wikipedia, which is being silly with its absurd "political correctness".--74.140.211.161 (talk) 22:53, 15 December 2006

By everyone you meant Russians? Yes, Russian people call it Kirovograd, becasue it's sound better in Russian language. But Ukrainians call it Kirovohrad! Remember, Kirovohrad is located in Ukraine, not in Russia. We (Ukrainians) don't tell you (Russians) how to call your cities in English version. Please don't tell us how to call and spell our cities. Thanks... --Oleg Kikta (talk) 22:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my passport I read clearly " born in Kirovograd ", it mean what in Ukraine, mostly in Kirovograd, we prefer named us kirovogradians and not kirovohradians. If something in history pronounce at native language, like "Ingul (the river of kirovograd)", it continuous called with the borth name. Your name for me is more simply pronunce Oleh but in your documents is Oleg.--man from Kirovograd —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.11.235.82 (talk) 21:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be better to rename Kirovohrad to Zlatopil. --68.38.122.179 (talk) 02:19, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This question about spelling is really quite simple. This is a Ukrainian city, and as such, must be listed in the Ukrainian language. Under Soviet and previously Russian governance, the Russian language was imposed. Now the official language is Ukrainian. Therefore KIROVOHRAD. [Just as on Google Maps]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.75.152.140 (talk) 14:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 July 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as clear consensus has been established. (closed by non-admin page mover) Music1201 talk 04:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



KirovohradKropyvnytskyi – reason:Kirovohrad was was officially renamed effective on 14 July 2016 to Kropyvnytskyi, thus the respective article should be renamed per WP:MODERNPLACENAME. The place had no established English name (and never had). Article is currently called after former local name that is not in use since 16 July, thus I propose to rename it to its new official local name according to WP:P-NUK and WP:UKR. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 14:59, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, whereas it is a big city I do not see much evidence that anybody cares about its name outside Ukraine, which means effectively that the official name would be also the most common usage name.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, I think that there is no rational reason why the old names would remain in the English Wikipedia. The only current names of cities are Dnipro, Kropyvnytskyi etc. The only argument in favor of keeping the old names could be an act of widely recognized committee of geographical names (United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names, Permanent Committee on Geographical Names, etc.) sanctioning name Kirovohrad. If there is no such act, there is no reason to differentiate the names of cities in Ukrainian and English. English name should be the equivalent of the official name (Ukrainian), transliterated according to the rules of Romanization of Ukrainian. Remain in Wikipedia "predecommunization" names has an ideologhical, not rational, basis. Dnipropetrovsk also to immediately rename into Dnipro.

Ales sandro (talk) 18:17, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kropyvnytskyi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kropyvnytskyi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

Most of the lead is about details on the name changes; there is already a name section so this needs to be trimmed or replaced with more useful information. Mellk (talk) 23:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]