Jump to content

Talk:Kroncong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Keroncong ore Krontjong was developed in Tugu a kampung near Jakarta. Kampung Tugu was given in 1611 to the Mardijkers by the VOC. Mardijkers (from merdeka)were freed mixed Portuguese, Bengali, South-Indian, Balinese slaves from Malacca who became Calvinists. Indo-European children who were not recognized by there European father intermarried with the Mardijkers. Kampung Tugu became a center of Mestizo-Portuguese culture were the so calles Portugis songs were developed based on 16th century Portuguese folksongs. The most famous songs are “Nina Bobo” en “Cafrinyo”. The main instrument used was a a five-string guitar related to the rajão from Madeira the so called keroncong-guitar. The name Keroncong derives from the sound of this guitar when plaid "keron-cong" Outcast Indo-Europeans so calles Buaya's (crocodiles) formed gangs and wondered from Kampung to kampung using keroncong to win the hards of woman, so spreading keroncong in Java. Keroncong orchestra's came to live in the 18th and 19th century after contact with other Mestizo kampungs like kampung Depok. Songs also became repertoire of other ethnic groups and each developped its own form of keroncong. The structure of the Portuguese texts had similarities with the Malay Pantun's and were ultimately replaced by them. Keroncong became populair all over Indonesia and Malaysia in the 19th century thanks to the Komedie Stamboel, an Indonsian form of opera developped by the Indo-European August Mahieu.

118.96.148.132 (talk) 05:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

[edit]

An editor added a large amount of text to this article on 18 March 2010 which copied from another website without permission. I have reverted back to the last known good version without the copyright violation, and with apologies to the subsequent editors who have worked on the article since in good faith and whose edits have been lost because of this. Please do not re-add the removed content. Thanks. ⇦REDVERS⇨ Say NO to Commons bullying 13:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend dividing out Kroncong (instrument) for better coverage

[edit]

The article is mostly about the genre. I suggest we split off content about the instrument, which features prominently in the genre, so that the separate article can focus on technical details and history, as well as pics, of the instrument, while this main article keeps up the good work on the genre. Thoughts? MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would tend to agree with this. The genre and the instrument are really two distinct topics. Zell Faze (talk) 23:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Kronchong Cadenza"

[edit]

I removed that bit, as it was full of errors. It should be cadence, by the way, not cadenza. For the goodies, please see Cadence (music). The progression I–I7–IV–V7–I claimed to be the Kronchong one is actually a standard sequence in many styles of music. Only the last two chords are a cadence (a perfect/authentic one). --Stfg (talk) 13:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Significant contradiction

[edit]

Which is correct, the article opener or the 'characteristics' section?? Tdimhcs (talk) 05:16, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kroncong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kroncong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Evolution subsections?

[edit]

May I ask what is the basis for the chronological descriptions of evolution? In case they are changed later, I am referring to: 4.1 Early Long Evolution 1552–1880 4.2 The Last Short Evolution 1880–now 4.2.1 Tempo Doeloe (1880–1920) 4.2.2 Kronchong Eternity (1920–1960) 4.2.3 The Era of Modern Kronchong (1960–2000) 4.2.4 Millennium Kroncong (2000–present) Are these commonly used terms or a framework established by one author? Because, as colourful as they are, there are very few citations. I would suggest that, if these are not commonly used terms for the different "eras" a simplification may be in order, between the "history" section which can talk about different eras, and musical descriptions involving chord progressions that are currently included in the Evolution section.--Dan Carkner (talk) 14:35, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kroncong&oldid=1199442553"