Jump to content

Talk:Kriti Sanon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For the record

[edit]

This article was originally created by a user who had been blocked from editing Wikipedia, and who was using a sockpuppet account to evade the block. Standard practice for articles created by means of block evasion is that the articles are to be deleted regardless of their merits (and with no prejudice against their being re-created by other users), unless the article has been substantially expanded by other users. Because this article has been substantially expanded by other users, it will not be deleted (or, at least, it will not be deleted solely on the grounds of having been created by a blocked user). User:DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image?

[edit]

Insertion of an image has not been successful - can anyone check?Super48paul (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth?

[edit]

Nupursanon (talk · contribs), who has declared a conflict of interest, is attempting to change the date of birth in the article from 1990 to 1989. We have a published source that shows her date of birth as 1990. While I feel that source is valid, I'll open the discussion and ask two questions. First, does anybody have other sources that comply with WP:RS and WP:BLPPRIMARY for the 1989 date of birth that would trump this one? Second, does anybody know any reason why the One India Entertainment source should be considered unreliable? —C.Fred (talk) 14:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nupursanon's latest edit includes this IBN Live story that would support the age for a 1989 birth. However, it doesn't show the full date of birth. —C.Fred (talk) 14:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

its also wrong his birth on1986 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.205.232.6 (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
103.205.232.6 - You're responding to a conversation that's almost 2 years old. The problem has been fixed. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a film

[edit]

Could someone please add Singh_Is_Bling to her filmography? Thanks. 65.130.19.235 (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone please add Ganapath to her filmography? Her character's name is Jassi. Thanks SanonFan (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And please make a page for Ganapath also. SanonFan (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 August 2014

[edit]

Add upcoming movie Singh Is Bling with akshay kumar in movie list.


thanks 14.139.194.12 (talk) 16:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 17:19, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello

[edit]

hi kriti sanon jaymin rathod (talk) 16:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discography

[edit]

Hi! Why here is a section of ==Discography==? It should be re-titled as ===Appearance in music videos===, because she has not sung that song. See this, it is discography of Arijit Singh. Like here it is written, "Co-star Tiger Shroff"; similarly she too is starring in the video, not singing. Or see what's the title here, but that should be expanded. Please correct here, Thanks! M. Billoo 18:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why Paas Aao is missing ? Co-Starring Sushant Singh Rajput SanonFan (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kriti Sanon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kriti Sanon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun patiala film page.

[edit]

Hello everyone, please create a a page on her upcoming Film arjun patiala. It's a request. Thanks. Rehmankhan7740 (talk) 12:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Houseful 4 addition to her filmography.

[edit]

Houseful 4 addition to her filmography. Rehmankhan7740 (talk) 11:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is Birth Place and Alma Mater necessary in Lede?

[edit]

@Cyphoidbomb: Sir, is it necessary to mention a subject's 'place of birth' and 'alma mater' in the lede since featured articles like Kareena Kapoor, Rani Mukerji do not mention them. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: Probably not since it's not why she's notable. Kind of reads like a public relations bio. I look at Featured Articles Brad Pitt and Ben Affleck and don't see a parallel. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree. The lead is a summary of the article, not just a summary of a person's career. As for FA parallels, one can have a look at Jessica Chastain and Brie Larson. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Cyphoidbomb, Krimuk2.0 , I have to agree with Cyphoidbomb here especially for the alma mater part. Both Jessica Chastain and Brie Larson studied theatre so that is relevant to their career but Engineering degree from Jaypee Institute of Information Technology has nothing to do with Sanon's modeling and acting career. So I believe it should not be a part of the lead. As far as her birth location is concerned, I believe it can only be mentioned if she was notable back in Delhi as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography#Context which writes .. Similarly, previous nationalities or the place of birth should not be mentioned in the lead unless they are relevant to the subject's notability.. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:30, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's ok if we don't mention where she was born in the lead, but I do believe education needs to be mentioned, or at the least what she studied (see Preity Zinta and Priyanka Chopra). Best example would be Emma Watson. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Taapsee Pannu has a degree in engineering too but her article lede only mentions her former job as a "Software Engineer" which is appropriate and for Vicky Kaushal as well who took an "engineering job briefly". But since Kriti Sanon's engineering degree has nothing to do with her modeling and acting career, I find its inclusion in the lede rather irrelevant as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography#Positions and roles which writes ..The notable position(s) or role(s) the person held should usually be stated in the opening paragraph. However, avoid overloading the lead paragraph with various and sundry roles; instead, emphasize what made the person notable. Incidental and non-notable roles (i.e. activities that are not integral to the person's notability) should usually not be mentioned in the lead paragraph. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Should I remove Delhi from the lede? It seems you guys have agreed to it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:01, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"NC 10 (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect NC 10 (film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 9#NC 10 (film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]

@182.66.189.254, Regarding these edits diff1 and diff2. In both of them you copypasted the sources from the Bachchan Pandey entry in the filmography section, instead of providing a new source specifying that filming for the film Ganapath has stated. Do not use wrong sources like this. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 September 2022

[edit]

She is known as Goddess of unbeauty. So please add 'Sanon is known as Goddess of unbeauty'. in her page 103.166.244.179 (talk) 01:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 September 2022 (2)

[edit]

She is known as Goddess of unbeauty. So please add 'Sanon is known as Goddess of unbeauty'. in her page. 103.166.244.179 (talk) 01:56, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Blazin777 (talk) 01:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Main picture

[edit]
2019
2022

I think this picture would be more suitable instead of the current one because it is the latest one and the current one is quite old. Kriti-Sanon.jpg Anjney11 (talk) 07:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current photo is from 2019, which is not "quite old." Unless we have a newer one of higher quality, I see no reason to replace it. This one from 2022 is of good quality, though the background is unfortunately somewhat busy. IMO the 2019 one is beter. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:32, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

about revert

[edit]

Hi @Krimuk2.0, can you please explain your revert. It is well referenced and documented that she is/ was a model, mentioned in the article itself. If you wanted, you could have added 'former'. That one sentence would give a summary intro to the actress/model/.Awsib (talk) 14:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please check all the links in the article, and provide a good reasoning why model should not be linked, at its first instance in an article related to model itself. I myself was not aware what modelling is what all about. 'India', 'Delhi', 'Engineering college' etc. needs a link and 'model' which itself is a separated fledged Wikipedia articles should not be linked in an article about a model.Hope, from next time you will first inform before such reverts and let the editor put his point, then do whatever you want. Awsib (talk) 15:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OVERLINK. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just because you have some tools and time doesn't mean you have to do something. If you are in confusion feel free to go through WP:CONSENSUS. Give a valid reason to why you feel 'model' should not be added as a link to the article while all other links are justified, else undo your revert, failing which I will. Awsib (talk) 14:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry that you're unable to understand what WP:ROLEBIO and WP:OVERLINK says, and how WP:BRD, WP:STATUSQUO and WP:CONSENSUS works. WP:COMPETENCY applies. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do Patti "acclaim"

[edit]

19Arham, once again reminding you that Wikipedia is not Reddit or Twitter for you to wage war for or against actresses and target other users. Per WP:BRD, the onus is on you to establish consensus via reliable sourcing that her performance in Do Patti has been acclaimed (and no, two sole reviews is not how you do that), and per your wording in lead, even more so than TBMAUJ. On top of all this, the DNA review you're so keen to add doesn't even work.Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where was this personal attack? You need to grow up, that was a discussion. Nobody is waging wars between actresses, I was providing an example from Bhatt’s article to show your clear hypocrisy when it comes to adding reviews as you went out of your way to omit the part of the NDTV review that said that Bhatt’s performance was weak but with Sanon who is actually being acclaimed for her work, you think you can gaslight me into thinking there’s only two positive reviews when in reality her performance is being unanimously praised. 19Arham (talk) 09:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, stop making up lies to make unhinged attacks against me and provide reliable sourcing to establish consensus that Sanon's performance is being "unanimously praised" more than her perf in TBMAUJ or even Crew. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@19Arham:, I realize that talk page discussions and disagreements over content can be frustrating, but hopefully you can reflect on the statement you made above - "Where was this personal attack? You need to grow up" - Asking where a personal attack is, followed by a personal attack, is in fact a personal attack. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please can YOU provide sources where her performance is being received negatively like? Why do I have to be the one to prove myself? Can you please provide sources where the dual role has been poorly-received because I’m yet to find these reviews you’re talking about. 19Arham (talk) 09:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When did I say her perf is being negatively received? A positive review of her performance already exists, which was added by another editor. We don't need any more for a film that's getting mostly negative reviews, much like a Bachchan Pandey, in which her performance was much superior than the film. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I have realised how these rules work now. 19Arham (talk) 18:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also wait for uninvolved editors to weigh in, and respect WP:BRD, WP:CONSENSUS and WP:STATUSQUO. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not the only editor who has complained about your hostility in the past, you are extremely rude towards others attempting to contribute, particularly new editors. As an editor, you should be willing to help others, not going out of your way to make them feel inferior with no explanation. 19Arham (talk) 09:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the third time in 24 hours in which I'm warning you to not make personal comments about me. Read WP:PERSONALATTACKS carefully. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where are the personal attacks? Sorry, can you highlight them for me? I genuinely have no clue how I have ‘attacked’ you 19Arham (talk) 09:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are repeatedly making comments on me and my supposed "behaviour" and you have no clue about that? WP:CIR applies. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that counts as an attack. My bad. 🫢 19Arham (talk) 09:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, this is not Reddit or Twitter for wisecracks. Either contribute professionally, or please shift your focus to blogs instead. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will continue to edit professionally and will not tolerate this treatment from you solely due to your experience, thank you. 19Arham (talk) 13:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG @Krimuk2.0
Below, I have compiled a list of reviews similar to the ones made by editors for Kapoor Khan in Heroine and Zeinta in KHNH:
The Hollywood Reporter - Positive
It’s easy to see why Sanon, also a co-producer, chose Do Patti as the feature debut for her production house, Blue Butterfly Films. The dual role offers her an opportunity to show her range — from the timid, tremulous Saumya, who suffers from anxiety and depression, to the provocative, vindictive Shailee, who will seemingly do whatever it takes to one-up her sister — and Sanon goes at both parts with gumption and sincerity.
Firstpost - Positive
And it is really amazing to watch Kriti’s grow as an actor and come to the point of acquiring a National award. I felt it is Kriti’s dual roles as Saumy Sood and as Shelly was most challenging. The film revolves around twin sisters and this is Kriti’s first ever dual role which she has done to perfection.
The New Indian Express -  Mixed
This is the first time Kriti is dabbling with a double role. She is more at ease as the timid Saumya than the outgoing Shailee. As the latter twin, her reference point seems to be Deepika Padukone in Cocktail (2012). After getting her heart broken by Dhruv, she downs Vodka straight from the bottle, shakes her frizzy hair and tries to dissolve in the sad beats of ‘Raanjhan’. It’s melodramatic, like a K-serial.
The Hindu - Positive
While Kriti delineates the double role well, as a device the trick doesn’t work for it points to the big reveal from a distance. It becomes more of an exercise to display the competent actor’s ability to play both the submissive and rebellious side of the feminine mind with felicity. Shaheer is expected to punch above his weight category without stealing the show and his confusion shows on screen.
NDTV - Mixed
Kriti Sanon makes a fair fist of her double act, deftly shuffling the cards at her disposal for maximum effect. But, as has already been pointed out, if some parts of Do Patti are more watchable than others, it is because a solid and steady Kajol is in them.
Hindustan Times - Positive
But the person who keeps you seated through it all is Kriti. The biggest win for Do Patti lies in the fact that you are convinced Shailee and Soumya are indeed two different people. Dumb to even mention that it would have been a disaster otherwise. You sit with rapt attention as you sympathise with Soumya, being beaten black and blue by Dhruv. You hate Shailee who dresses up exactly like her sister on her wedding day, just to piss her off.
The Indian Express - Dubious
Kriti Sanon’s double act — helpfully described as ‘Seeta aur Geeta’, just in case we miss it — seems to have been created solely for the actor to show us that she can do both docile-and-wanton. Yes, she can, and Sanon does build on the promise she had shown in ‘Teri Baaton Mein Aisa Uljha Jiya’, especially in the gleefully demented climactic scene in which she steals the film. But Saumya’s presence, giving off a thick-kohl-eyed-Deepika Padukone-’Cocktail’ vibe, feels like a force-fit into a film which wants to talk about domestic abuse.
Filmfare - Positive
Twenty years ago, even ten years ago, it would have been Kajol who would have been cast in the role of twin sisters. Being in the same film as Kajol is a calculated risk for other actors as they’ll always get compared to her. So it was brave of Kriti Sanon to start off her innings as a producer in such a vein. Writer Kanika Dhillon has worked real hard to bring out the differences between Saumya and Shailee. And Kriti Sanon has followed the script and debutant director Shashanka Chaturvedi’s direction to a T. The audience would be more drawn to the siren Shailee, who believes in living for the moment, than the docile Saumya, who suffers from emotional trauma. Everyone has their own triggers, their own responses to trauma. While some internalise and suppress the memories, some indulge in escapism as their defence. Saumya and Shailee are two sides of the same coin. They come across as real sisters fighting over petty things since childhood. Kriti is basically emoting against herself and has worked hard to make sure the different personalities come through. In her interviews, she has mentioned she wants to play more layered roles and her wish has been fulfilled.
Deccan Chronicle - Mixed
The film truly belongs to Kriti Sanon. As producer, she has film-maker Shashanka Chaturvedi working hard to project her talent. She may not be top-notch, but that is a failure in the character-sketching than in character interpretation.
The Times of India - Negative
Kriti Sanon looks gorgeous and over the years has evolved as far as her performance and choices are concerned. However, beyond the distinct external appearance, she struggles to internalise the nuances of her dual role as she oscillates between them.
Bollywood Hungama - Positive
Kriti Sanon performs both roles with panache. Thankfully, the way both characters are designed, it is easy to distinguish them and Kriti, with her performance, further makes them seem distinct. As Saumya, she underplays well and as Shailee, she’s quite confident.
mint - Positive
Sanon has some fun playing the vampy evil twin—a plastered Shailee imitating her sister telling her to drink some water ("TU paani pee le") is hilarious.
India Today - Negative
Kriti as Saumya looks too demure and as Shailee, she almost emulates Deepika Padukone's Veronica from Cocktail…
Scroll.in - Mixed
Although Kriti Sanon can’t get Saumya to be very different from Shailee, she is compelling in her anguish as well as her inner strength.
WION - Positive
First of all, Kriti Sanon deserves a special mention. She has matured as an actor and how! Playing a double role for the first time in her career, Kriti deserves an applause for bringing drama, grit, and naivety to both her roles at ease. Kriti plays herself as twin sisters who start off on the wrong foot as kids and end up hating each other as adults, so much so they are willing to sabotage it all and put everything in line for their sibling to fail.
CNBC - Positive
Sanon’s maiden production venture, Do Patti keeps her front and centre, making her do all the heavy lifting. She uses it to the best of her abilities, showcasing her carefully curated range and how far she has come as a performer in the last decade. Watch out for a pivotal scene in the second half when Saumya unravels entirely. Rooted in a lifetime of trauma and abuse, that sequence is a revelation, it’s Sanon’s career best yet.  
News18 - Positive
Kriti Sanon Delivers Career-Best Performance, But Kajol Deserves More Nuanced Role
The film, which marks Kriti Sanon’s debut as a producer, has several layers to it, all of which is treated with utmost sensitivity. Themes of violence, betrayal and jealousy loom large over the narrative. Set in a grayish fictional hill station of Devipur, Do Patti is the story of identical twin sisters, Saumya and Shailee, their love interest Varun Sood and investigating officer Vidya Jyoti and their interpersonal relationships.
Deccan Herald - Positive
and Kriti is good in flashes — especially in the evil twin role.
ABP Live - Positive
Kriti Sanon, too, does well in her double role and looks stunning…
DNA India - Positive
An actor's true test happens when they're offered double roles. Dilip Kumar from Ram Aur Shyam, Hema Malini from Seeta Aur Geeta, Sridevi from Chaal-Baaz, and Kangana Ranaut from Tanu Weds Manu Returns are a few memorable examples of actors acting the dual roles. Kriti Sanon has added a beautiful feather to her cap. She has delivered her career-best performance. Kriti has made sure to differentiate Saumya and Shailee with their characteristics. Saumya is a shy, homely, timid lady. Whereas, Shailee is a badass, sexy, bold, borderline bitchy with a devil-may-care attitude girl. You will feel the pain of Saumya and will hate Shailee on several occasions, and that's where Kriti wins.
Rediff - Positive
Despite the odds, Kriti Sanon's smooth balancing act is the saving grace of her maiden co-production with Kanika Dhillon, as she goes from one extreme to another playing both naughty and nice.
Khaleej Times - Positive
Handling two diverse and complex characters, Sanon comes out a winner despite the weak script.
Free Press Journal - Positive
Kriti Sanon shines as the film's star, effortlessly embodying the contrasting personalities of Shailee and Saumya. Her compelling duality makes us care about the sisters, even as the plot threatens to collapse.
Majority Opinion (Result): As proven above, 17/25 (the majority) of the reviews are positive and the other 8 are either mixed (4), negative (3) or dubious (1) and, as I’ve said before, the criticism is generally towards the film whilst Sanon is being praised for preventing a poor script from hindering her performance. A different quote can be used that is more appropriate but it’s clear that the review being currently utilised isn’t representative of the general opinion. 19Arham (talk) 19:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The review being used does provide a positive opinion of her performance and a negative one of the film, as seems to be the general consensus. So I fail to see the problem. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because there’s only two reviews that talk about how she wasn’t able to differentiate the twins. 19Arham (talk) 18:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've removed that part now. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you're continuing to edit-war by citing some non-existent policy named WP:3PR, while still making personal comments instead of the subject at hand. Pinging uninvolved users Shshshsh, FrB.TG, Keivan.f, CNMall41 and Fylindfotberserk for their comments. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19Arham, what you're doing here is a classic example of synthesizing information to advance a specific point of view that is not explicitly supported by any of the sources: cherry-picking three individual reviews to make a broad claim that critics praised her performance. To keep this claim in place, you would need a reliable source that explicitly says that critics praised her performance and not just individual review(s). Also, I'd recommend that you focus on the content, not editors ("I was providing an example from Bhatt’s article to show your clear hypocrisy" is just unacceptable). FrB.TG (talk) 09:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, keeping the latter part of your reply to one side, the articles mentioned in the body of text are both reliable sources as per WP:RS. The claim that Sanon’s performance was received negatively is completely false as I can provide a multitude of reliable critics that have solely received the film negatively but have remained consistent in their praise for her performance. Please bear this in mind when reviewing. 19Arham (talk) 09:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now regarding the latter half of your comment, I can acknowledge wrongdoings in my side towards the editor, however, this was simply a retaliation against the comments made against my editing and utilising his said experience against me as I did not know what falls under a ‘personal attack’. 19Arham (talk) 09:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel that the two reviews that called it her career's best performance are representative of what the rest of the sources say, I recommend that you build your case here on talk page by listing reviews by major publications (in a similar fashion to this). If most of the reviews are indeed positive, you can re-add the two reviews but bear in mind that for the lead, you would still need a source that explicitly confirms the claim that critics praised her performance. FrB.TG (talk) 10:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Only four days since the release, and these two sources claim it to be her "Career-Best Performance". Extraordinary claim IMO. We should wait for some time, atleast a month, get more RS regarding this in the mean time. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to add that for this specific performance, I took reference from the section in Kareena Kapoor Khan's regarding her performance in Heroine in which the editor added a critic's take that it was 'her best performance to date' despite the film having overwhelmingly negative feedback. Can you please differentiate the two situations as Sanon's performance is being praised in a similar fashion despite Do Patti being received poorly? 19Arham (talk) 12:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not true. All Heroine reviews were analysed on talk page before addition to the article. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay thanks, I will attempt to do the same as this editor. 19Arham (talk) 17:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, akin to what FrB.TG said, I would highly recommend creating a subsection of reviews where commentary on her performance from each critic is quoted. Just cherrypicking from reviews based on what comliments her more could actually be an insult to the actress and her talent. Thank you, Krimuk, for always keeping a close eye and making sure everything is within limits. Shahid • Talk2me 11:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It's really hard to maintain the quality of articles when one is met with such hate and hostility. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think a "reception" section would be appropriate such as that on the page for Meryl Streep and other actresses. However, it should stick to references that talk about her legacy, not mentions of performances in reviews about the films. Otherwise we will have a reception section longer than the rest of the page. Just my opinion in order to keep down on any future FANCRUFT. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to add something. I added the Scroll review as I found it to be the most balanced one. 19Arham even I read every review before adding the one I did. You can read multiple Actresses pages, reviews are mostly balanced. Beside this, discussion with more experienced editors can be done in the talk section. Reverting edits again and again was not an option. Also I feel Krimuk2.0 doesn't change others edit according to his will, rather he juake it look more understandable.m YaaraX (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The most ‘balanced’ reviews are not always the most accurate. Just because the critic praises a facet of the actress' performance does not mean it requires a negative take - a performance can simply be good. 19Arham (talk) 12:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Also I feel Krimuk2.0 doesn't change others edit according to his will, rather he juake it look more understandable" - Please WP:AGF. I don't think things were changed "according to his will" (your words quoted). The content was objected to so there must be a discussion and WP:CONSENSUS per WP:ONUS prior to adding anything back. At this point, I would recommend starting a new thread with the proposed wording and allow editors to !vote to get consensus.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kriti_Sanon&oldid=1256721043"