Talk:Kristen Arnett

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 1 July 2020 by reviewer Megalibrarygirl (talk · contribs).

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Wiki Loves Pride

This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2020.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles

21:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC) Respondebat illa (talk) 21:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on extlinks

Generally, you shouldn't have external links in the main body of an article. It's OK to leave something as a red link (e.g. Black Mountain Institute) if it's a notable topic. When someone writes an article for it, it will be linked automatically, and until then the red link acts as a hint to other interested editors that the article is needed. If the topic isn't individually notable (e.g. each of the subject's books), don't link them. You can leave a link to her publisher in the external links section, but not in the body. pburka (talk) 00:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We must preserve Marvin at all costs

Lads, if anybody dares take down the “Marvin” section, they will be met with a fire of a scale not yet seen in this world.

Praise be the Marv Blepii (talk) 07:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Writer v author

The category name is writer. It makes sense to use writer to describe people in the body of the article as well.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:45, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to the biography, she writes novels, stories and essays, and the lead says she's an "author and essayist". An essayist is a kind of writer, so "writer and essayist" doesn't make sense. We could say "novelist, short story writer and essayist", if you want to be more verbose and precise. pburka (talk) 14:15, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]