A fact from Krejčíková–Siniaková doubles team appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project. Tag more articles with our standard project template. Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that in tennis, Barbora Krejčíková and Kateřina Siniaková(pictured) have not lost a Grand Slam match for over a year? Source: "Katerina Siniakova and Barbora Krejcikova have extended their Grand Slam tournament winning streak to 24 matches" ref 42 (also see this table)
ALT3: ... that in tennis, Barbora Krejčíková and Kateřina Siniaková(pictured) have won the last four Grand Slams they have entered? Source: "In Grand Slam play during 2022, Krejcikova and Siniakova were a perfect 18-0, winning the Australian Open, Wimbledon and, now, the US Open. Krejcikova was unable to participate in doubles at Roland Garros after testing positive for COVID-19 and having to withdraw before she and Siniakova were to play in their first-round match" ref 36 (plus latest Aus Open)
Comment: The next Grand Slam is not until May, so no changes to these facts should arise. Also, the picture in the infobox is emblematic of their communication between points, but I think less lively.
Overall: New enough and long enough. Well sourced. Copyvio check good. No issues with photo, and I agree this is better for DYK than infobox photo. QPQ done. I prefer ALT1. Riley1012 (talk) 19:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hameltion:, I saw the inaccurate doubles performance timeline in the hidden comment. I can help you finish it.
Were you thinking on having a timeline which only included results from events where the duo had played together as a team OR combine both player's doubles results and also include results from events when they played with different partners? See my subpage for assistance. Qwerty284651 (talk) 00:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They've played 1 Fed Cup as a team (2019), in another 1 year prior (2018) they were scheduled to play but the match wasn't played as a dead rubber. Do I need their 2018 result to the timeline? Qwerty284651 (talk) 15:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there's a way to find where they place on this list every year (even when not qualifying for the tour finals), that would be best. Otherwise I'd say just leave out the rankings in non-qualifying years. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 14:15, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The note looks fine. I am wondering where the data at the bottom is sourced from; e.g., 2017 says they played two tournaments (I think maybe Stuttgart was one?) but the only one listed they didn't actually play together.
See difference in old: https://event.itftennis.com/itf/web/usercontrols/tournaments/tournamentprintabledrawsheets.aspx?tournamentid=1020000331&tenniscatecode=WT&eventid=1020000475
vs. new url: https://www.itftennis.com/en/tournament/draws-and-results/print/?tournamentId=1020000331&circuitCode=WT&matchTypeCode=S&eventClassificationCode=M. Qwerty284651 (talk) 14:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moscow, you're right, not Stuggart, that was their reuniting in 2016. But I still worry that the totals in the table are unreliable; e.g., the "2" tournaments in 2017 seems to be incorrectly including the Italian Open where they both reached the quarterfinals but with different partners.Flashscore only shows 1 event (Moscow) if you scroll to bottom of doubles tab. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 19:17, 1 March 2023 (UTC) Ah, you fixed while I was commenting. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 19:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My question still remains though - what source are you using for the stats portion of the table? For example, I don't know if this is reliable but many of our numbers are currently different. And there are apparently still errors in our table, such as the 2022 win-loss records by surface not adding up and the unupdated Italian Open row total. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 19:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hameltion, if we played by the book, NONE of the tennis performance timelines should even be on Wikipedia per WP:OR, but it's in the tennis guidelines, community-based consensus, so technically albeit unsourced and, in fact, originally researched still acceptable. Qwerty284651 (talk) 15:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not trying to change any consensus, but am curious what source(s) you're using to build the table. I'll try to double check everything (using Flashscore) eventually. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 15:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that seems much more official than Flashscore. But I'm going to hide the chart until I get a chance to fix the errors; even the very bare first column has one (saying they reached a WTA Tour final ... with no tour-level wins). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I haven't been clear - the table is rife with errors right now, I've pointed out several places the numbers don't add up. I realize unfortunately I don't have the savvy to fix this sort of table myself, only really to spot the errors. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 14:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, though the whole chart needs I think to be scoured top to bottom. Three that I mentioned above: 2014 Finals: 1 (should be 0, they didn't win a tour-level match that year); 2018 Titles: 0 (should be 2 - RG and Wimbledon); Italian Open: 0/4 (should be 0/3). Another: 2017 Tournaments: 2 (should be 1, which aligns with the correctly listed 2-1 record). There are probably others like that, though I'm most concerned about errors that aren't easily caught because they include tournament results not included in the table and that may affect the overall W-L record (important to get that accurate). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've just gone through it (fairly small change to overall W-L: 2 more W, 1 fewer L). I would have preferred to keep it hidden longer while it had errors, but your unhiding prompted me to get to it sooner. Visual editor definitely helped. Notes for self: 2014 fixed. 2015 fine. 2016 fixed. 2017 fixed. 2018 fixed. 2019 fixed. 2020 fine. 2021 fixed. 2022 fixed. 2023 fine. SR not checked, hidden. W-L totals fixed. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 02:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]