Talk:Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Recent history" section additions

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I work for Rubenstein Communications and on behalf of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, I want to bring a third party editor’s attention to the recent additions to the “Recent history” section of this page. To mitigate conflict of interest issues, I ask that an editor review and edit accordingly.

The section is poorly written and possibly violates WP:UNDUE, WP:BLPNAME, and WP:NOR. And while the content links directly to many third party sources, it lacks inline citations. Also, some portions of the content are inaccurate and misinterpreted. NinaSpezz (talk) 16:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NinaSpezz: it would help if you could name the user so I know which edits to take a look at. --I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 15:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kethrus: Edits were made by User:170.170.59.139 on March 29, 2015 and User:RobPappis on August 22, 2015. NinaSpezz (talk) 16:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NinaSpezz: I've removed the section, if someone wishes to rewrite it properly with valid sources they can. --I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 15:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]