Talk:Kovin Fortress

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 22 July 2017 by reviewer Shadowowl (talk · contribs).

Cultural Heritage of Serbia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Cultural Heritage of SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaCultural Heritage of Serbia articles

Serbia

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Draft

Justlettersandnumbers, I had tagged this as unreferrenced and as a stub. Its not a copyvio, has articles on other wikis, is relatively well written, and doesn't contain any information that would be controversial. I think it might make the most sense to have let it been developed in main space. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TonyBallioni, from the history it appears that there was an edit conflict here, though I got no warning of one. Of course I would not have done what I did if I had known that you had edited the page. The content is, as you say, pretty innocuous; it's also without any citations. I thought (and think) that the best place for the editor to remedy that in peace and at leisure is draft space, so clearly we don't precisely agree on that. My feeling is that we already have more unreferenced content than we can cope with, and should not do anything to add to it. However, please do whatever you think best here, I don't feel strongly about it. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]