Jump to content

Talk:Kota, Rajasthan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

There is another article with Kota_(India) name. It was linked from Kota page originally. I have put some template there, which we can start putting information on. Once it is reasonably written we can merge there two pages (Kota_(India) and Kota, Rajasthan)

Ashish G 18:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, merge asap deeptrivia 05:34, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, they should be merged. I propose that the title "Kota, Rajasthan" be retained; there may be other small places in India by the name Kota. Does it need an admin to do the merging? ImpuMozhi 23:23, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Just go ahead and do it, and make Kota (India) a redirect page to here.
However, shouldn't Kota and Kota district be separate articles? Kota has a population of around 0.5 million while the whole district has a population of around 1.6 million. Matthewmayer 02:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
They can be, but lets start by adding content on this page itself, and when we have sufficient info to make another article, that will be done. Ashish G 21:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I agree it to be merged, I belong to this city and suggest to retain "Kota,Rajasthan". enlighting

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition

[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 07:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Population

[edit]

A warning was issued (above) that population stateed is from district, but in "Demographics" the population of the district (1,6) remain as the city population. Please change it.--83.33.219.254 (talk) 17:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Places of Interest

[edit]

Does the Places of interest section really need to list out each and every spot in the city? Even the New Delhi page doesn't list out those many.

I suggest we remove the non-important ones and keep those which are bona fide tourist destinations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthrophilic (talk • contribs) 14:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your suggestion. Shyamsunder (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Removing the following:
  1. Sawan phuhar Water Park,the first and only amusement water park in the Hadoti region. (uncited advertisement)
  2. Haryali & Maheshwari Resorts cum restaurants, (advertisement)
  3. Umed Bhavan Palace(Luxury Hotel) (Can be included under a separate header for hotels but not really a place of tourist interest, as such)
  4. Hadoti Traffic Garden (Not really notable)
  5. Godavari Dham Mandir, a temple (redundant, mentioned twice.)
Should Agamgarh Saheb Gurudwara and Tirupati Balaji Temple be included ? I don't think they're really places of interest.

Anthrophilic (talk) 12:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chambal River

[edit]

Suggest removal of section, entirely. The Chambal river is not really relevant to the article. A separate article already exists for the same.

Anthrophilic (talk) 13:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC) population of kota is 1950491(census 2011) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.252.137.67 (talk) 13:28, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Udaipur highway.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Udaipur highway.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:34, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection request

[edit]

Looking at the number of vandalism attends by multiple IPs and a new user (possibly a SPA account of Aamir pathan27 (talk · contribs), I've requested semi-protection for the article. They are continuously changing the population and settlement type to metropolitan. See http://www.census2011.co.in/census/city/90-kota.html. And i'm tired of it... Shivamsetu (talk) 10:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: requests for changes to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. --ElHef (Meep?) 13:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Places of Interest

[edit]

I am thinking of adding new section Places of Interest with sources. I saw it in the earlier versions of this page. Please help in making the new section more concise.Vibhss (talk) 12:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kota, Rajasthan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kota, Rajasthan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kota, Rajasthan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 February 2018

[edit]

the page is quite ok but in college section there must be some more name like 1: Govt. college kota. 2:J.D.B. girls college kota. Lalitnagar9772 (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. qwerty6811 :-) (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2018

[edit]
Etoosindia (talk) 12:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir, We are online Learning coaching institute (Name: Etoosindia) providing Online Video Lectures & Courses for JEE Main & Advanced.We want to add our coaching Institute name with Url in your Article position "Coaching Institute"

Like : Coaching institutions Aakash Institute Allen Career Institute Bansal Classes Career Point Etoosindia Motion Education Pvt. Ltd Resonance Sarvottam Career Institute Vibrant Academy


regard Etoosidnia team

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Specifically, you need to provide reliable, third-party sources that demonstrate compliance with the general guideline on notability and the specific guideline for companies and organizations. I suggest that you also read the conflict-of-interest policy. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kota,_Rajasthan&oldid=1212084624"