Talk:Korkoro/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 03:56, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Citations are used well and are appropriately reliable.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Scope is grand.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article is neutral.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- History is stable.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Images are all appropriately tagged with very solid rationales. However, there are quite a lot of non-free images being used - four of the images are fair-use, including three screenshots. I would remove one of the two being used in the Reception section, as they both show the same character and one could reasonably do the job of both, though I'll leave it up to you to decide which is more important to keep.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- I'm going to pass this article as is for now. I still feel that there's one too many non-free images being used, but I don't think that is enough to hinder this for the time being. I think you could quite easily bring this to WP:FAC, though one of those images would definitely have to go before that; and whilst I have no problems with your prose style, the way you handle paraphrasing might raise questions there, so don't worry if they're harsher on it than I am. All in all, well done on a very well-written article. GRAPPLE X 03:56, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- I removed one non free image. I used American Beauty for reference when writing this page, and thought one has to use lots of media for illustration, as in the former. The article is currently undergoing a copy edit by Truthkeeper, after which I would nominate for an A Class review. This would be my first FAC. Thanks for your review. That was like getting straight As :) morelMWilliam 16:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Good luck with taking it forward! GRAPPLE X 16:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- I removed one non free image. I used American Beauty for reference when writing this page, and thought one has to use lots of media for illustration, as in the former. The article is currently undergoing a copy edit by Truthkeeper, after which I would nominate for an A Class review. This would be my first FAC. Thanks for your review. That was like getting straight As :) morelMWilliam 16:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm going to pass this article as is for now. I still feel that there's one too many non-free images being used, but I don't think that is enough to hinder this for the time being. I think you could quite easily bring this to WP:FAC, though one of those images would definitely have to go before that; and whilst I have no problems with your prose style, the way you handle paraphrasing might raise questions there, so don't worry if they're harsher on it than I am. All in all, well done on a very well-written article. GRAPPLE X 03:56, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
