Talk:Korean Wikipedia

This article was nominated for deletion on February 18, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Wikipedia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

[Untitled]

Is Wikipedia totally banned in North Korea?124.179.245.115 (talk) 11:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad we have this article, but I can't help but wonder about the emphasis on the fact that the Korean Wikipedia uses hangul only -- I mean, what else would it use? Runes? Cyrillic? Using hangul (with occasional dabs of hanja and romaja) is, after all, the more-or-less universal practice when writing modern Korean. Why should we emphasize a trait which the Korean Wikipedia shares with the entire internet? -- Visviva 06:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because some professional Korean texts use a larger amount of Hanja, while the net doesn't, and Wikipedia falls somewhere between a physical encyclopedia and the rest of the internet.--ikiroid | (talk) 16:27, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citation(s) needed

Does anyone know where the location of the servers can be verified? --Imaginationac (Talk | Edits) 19:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]