Talk:Konnan/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are a number of issues that need to be addressed.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):

The prose is OK, maybe a 6/10.

The lead is short and untidy. It should be expanded into seperate, organised paragraphs describing Konnan's career.

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

A number of sections are lacking citations, with a number of paragraphs totally unreferenced, some containing controversial information. This must be addressed by someone. I recommend at least one citation per paragraph and if an editor wants more guidance, please leave a message here or at my talk page.--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN again. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we both forgot about this one. :) How is it now? Nikki♥311 00:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Passed GAR--Jackyd101 (talk) 14:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]