Talk:Kokoda Track campaign order of battle

Military history: Asian / South Pacific / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Kokoda Track campaign order of battle is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 14:38, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Rationale of entries

I am interested in the rationale of some entries. Herring is omitted as GOC NGF? The 14th Bde is included even though it was not deployed (although 3rd Bn was detached and deployed and is entered twice). Conversely, the 49th Bn was part of 30th Bde but was not deployed and it might be reasonable to include it but note that it was not deployed? 03:48, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Herring was GOC I Corps; Blamey was GOC New Guinea Force at that time. Herring commanded New Guinea Force from 23 May 1943 to 26 August 1943. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm Looks like you're correct. Reinstated Herring. Re the inclusion: I am inclined to include every unit that was part of New Guinea Force, as my interest is with the base troops. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then perhaps there needs to be a statement to this effect and a distinction as to which actually served along the track? Cinderella157 (talk) 01:38, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a plan. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:52, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No issue with any revisions but just to clarify the only rationale I had for what I included he originally was what was included in the source I had available to me at the time. Anotherclown (talk) 09:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Been thinking on this. Just trying to work out the rationale for including or not including units. Every unit that was part of NGF would have to include Kanga and Milne forces? Even every unit at PM and forward along the track would have to cast a much wider net. Initially, Allen was tasked with the defence of PM but this then narrowed to the Maroubra AO. Not certain if this included patrols by 2/6th Ind Coy, Jawforce, Honer Force or 49th Bn conducted to flanks? Regardless, This might provide a useful delineation? It might be useful to report who commanded Maroubra as a timeline since Maroubra was the pointy end at any time so: Owen, Watson, Cameron, Honer, Porter, Potts, Porter, Eather, Allen and Vasey. I understand the intention but not the practicality. Cinderella157 (talk) 10:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check dates

Hawkeye7, would you mind checking the dates you added with this edit :) Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 07:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done (Checks) They are correct. Nominally Allen remained in command of the 7th Division until 14 Match 1943. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]