Talk:Kobeigane Divisional Secretariat
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 June 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kobeigane Divisional Secretariat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110107055102/http://www.ds.gov.lk/div_sec/div_eng/Div_Sec_home2.php to http://www.ds.gov.lk/div_sec/div_eng/Div_Sec_home2.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
primary sources
[edit]Four sources is good, and I acknowledge the dedication of whoever is doing this, but we need secondary sources WP:RS. Although I don't want to pick on Sri Lankan governing bodies, I am fine whatever consensus is in terms of outcome, but could a list more easily cover the same info as this plethora of teeny name mentions? Elinruby (talk) 14:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Elinruby, national government websites are reliable independent sources. Dan arndt (talk) 23:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- ok, well. I am ok with whatever gets decided here. While I don't want to be mean to Sri Lanka, I myself don't see how it is useful to have dozens of articles that say nothing more than Kobeigane Divisional Secretariat is the Divisional Secretariat named Kobeigane Divisional Secretariat. I would appreciate a ping from the closer so that I can educate myself on whether Mr. Arndt is right about that. As far as I know government sources are acceptable (but not preferred) for verifiability, but do not however convey notability. Elinruby (talk) 00:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)