Jump to content

Talk:Koç School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

opinions??

[edit]

Article is biased against the school administration although opinions expressed in the article are mostly accurate.

"domestically it fails repeatedly every year." This is a biased generalization, which not only lacks detailed desciption of the school policy towards OSS (national examination), but also fails to remember that the school history entails one first place in OSS, with many more first hundred places in every year, an achievement that only a few school can boast about in Turkey. (Oguzhan Atay, The Koc School, 2007)


"The Overseas College Guidance Office has displayed its lack of professionalism many times - for example, by forgetting to sign some of the students' documents, by mixing up applications, by requesting that the students change their teacher recommendations several times throughout the admission process. Needless to say, even though the school has some success with overseas admissions..." The article is biased. Regarding this excerpt; The Koc School has one of the best overseas college guidance offices, as stated today by the head of admission of Penn State. Many students in Turkey who apply overseas envy The Koç School's guidance for overseas universities. NOTE: She claimed that it is the best overseas counseling office in the world though it is disputable. (Denizhan Duran, The Koç School, Class of 2007)

The article is biased as far as facts are biased. I was a member of this school. My teacher recommendations were changed several times without my consent. My documents were forgotten to be signed. I don't give a fiddler's fart what Penn State admission head says. -Anlam K.

"For instance, good technical students easily supersede their teachers in fields such as mathematics and physics and hence get 5s - equivalent of an A in the Turkish system - effortlessly" The school offers IB and regular classes. The examples given in the article are utterly wrong since mathematics and physics teachers for IB high level courses are one of the best teachers in their fields, not only at the Koc School, but also in Turkey and probably the world. I have not met a single person who "superseded" Mr. Ives and Mr. Kamper, physics and math teachers respectively. (Oguzhan Atay, The Koc School)

"While the school allegedly puts a lot of effort into extracurricular activities, the only activity that gets solid attention is MUN - "Mun is the most important activity because it advertises the school's name" as the high school's headmaster Fusun Ersoy has said, unwittingly proving the school's shallow insistence on appearance and reputation without much substance" MUN isn't the only social activity that takes attention; the school adminstration values its sport teams and arts groups as well. Also, Füsun Ersoy, the school's headmaster never claimed that MUN was the most important activity in school, since it's not possible to distinguish between clubs in a very prestigious school. MUN isn't shallow and it isn't only appearance and reputation; the school gains prominence with many awards gained in national or international science or creativity projects. Both these two fallacious comments are bitter for such an important school in Turkey. (Denizhan Duran, The Koç School, Class of 2007)

" Also, Füsun Ersoy, the school's headmaster never claimed that MUN was the most important activity in school, since it's not possible to distinguish between clubs in a very prestigious school." This is a factual inaccuracy. Fusun Ersoy said this and if you ask Seda Sengor (assuming she has a memory slightly longer than a year - very dubious), she will confirm what I have written. When she said this, you probably still were wearing your diapers. The comments are not bitter. Whatever emotional content you may see under them is irrelevant. What is important is that they are factually true. -Anlam K.


I can see that your (Anlam K.) sources are very reliable and not subject to any debate. Your mind and Seda Sengor's memory (presumably) are the best ways to prove a statement. And I can see that "factually true" means very little to you. Therefore, it is no wonder that you attack anyone or anything in the case of this school which challenges your ideas. And for bitterness, I can only say that your comment about "diapers" --though not directed at me -- is equally neither bitter nor emotional. It is a pity on the part of this school that the education you have received here has not thought you modesty, factual accuracy or manners. This is the only "fact" which supports your arguments on the low quality of this school. If you do not have the record of anything, you have nothing to base your arguments. Please stop being rude and using "weasel words." --Oguzhan Atay, Class of '07 (16 Feb 2007)

First, my comment about diapers was directed at you but it wasn't bitter or emotional. It was cold and sarcastic if you want to know. Second, it is not a pity on the part of this school that the "education" (?) I received has not taught me modesty or manners, since a school is not supposed to mold the personalities of its students in a semi-totalitarian manner. A school is supposed to provide a free environment in which students flourish as individuals. Koc was (still is?) pretty fixated about certain exotic disciplinary agendas such as the dress code when I was there. Look, whine as much as you want. I know that she has said that - it is factually, actually true. It is a simple premise of theory of knowledge that being unable to prove something with mathematical accuracy does not rule out the possibility that proposition is still true. ("If you do not have the record of anything, you have nothing to base your arguments." I can see that whole ToK education has been a waste for you. See my note on diapers.) And look at the overwhelming evidence, look at all the funding and attention MUN receives as opposed to other activities in the school, such as athletics, chess and sciences. I mean I could cite a multitude of events about why this school fails bitterly in some very crucial respects. (Note that there are some very good and inspiring teachers such as Raymond Ives and Gautam Sen.) When the 9/11 attacks occurred, the headmaster at the time John Chandler wanted us to have a moment of silence for the victims. Fair enough. However, when the US invaded Afghanistan shortly after, Mr. Sen suggested that we also have a moment of silence for Afghan victims. Reasonable request right? The administration declined, saying we were a "politically neutral" school. Politically neutral my ass... Debate all you want, kid, all odds are against you. -Anlam Kuyusu


Your comment about diapers were not directed at me, because I was not the one making the comment about MUN to begin with. Still, you may resume your personal attacks. Your style of arguments shows what kind of a person you are anyway. Yes, Koc education (? in your terminology) was a total waste for you. Education is not all fact-memorization; it includes manners. And learning manners is NOT molding personality. I wish you could compare Koc and other schools in terms of flexibility of rules - Koc's disciplinary agenda vs. MEB's rules. Maybe Koc may not have the education you would like to have because basically it can't do that. On the other hand, it is a simple premise of wiki that an argument which does not have any verifiability in terms of wiki's standards should not be put into a neutral article. Moreover, Fusun Ersoy's views do not necessarily reflect Koc's mission and vision at all times. I was merely pointing out to you that your argument lacks concrete evidence (still does -- though I am not saying it is not true.) I wonder: You were 50 years old when I had diapers, right, 'kid'? "Akil yasta degil bastadir" 9/11 attacks and US invasion are NOT the same. I assume you understand that one is a terrorist attack. Do YOU know which one by any chance? My last question: What odds? Oguzhan Atay

Fair use rationale for Image:Logokoc.gif

[edit]

Image:Logokoc.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:OBworkingstyle.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:OBworkingstyle.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:OBworkingstyle.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ib-logo-250x246.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Ib-logo-250x246.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Ib-logo-250x246.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mundp.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Mundp.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mundp.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campuskoc.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Campuskoc.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 8 March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Campuskoc.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:01, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011Graduates.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:2011Graduates.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:2011Graduates.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sevgigonulartnight.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Sevgigonulartnight.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Sevgigonulartnight.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egitim fotograf 3.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Egitim fotograf 3.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Egitim fotograf 3.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:KocSchool(KocOzelLisesi).jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:KocSchool(KocOzelLisesi).jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:KocSchool(KocOzelLisesi).jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Koç School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Koç School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Koç School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"KÖL" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect KÖL and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22 § KÖL until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Koç_School&oldid=1202823620"