Talk:Knobstick wedding

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

A fact from Knobstick wedding appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the groom was not always a willing participant in a knobstick wedding?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Knobstick wedding.

Wikipedia

Country?

I can guess from the citations and other such clues in the article, but shouldn't this article start by stating what countries this practice was common in? FruitMonkey (talk) 11:34, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. PrincessSparkleKitty822 (talk) 05:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William Saxton & Lydia Brooks

The description of the Saxton wedding (the one mentioned in the Times in 1829) is slightly misleading, as it implies that Saxton was forced to marry Brooks because he was the presumed father of her child; this type of shotgun/knobstick wedding wasn't unusual and certainly wouldn't have made the London press. The scandal in this case was that Saxton (a drunken pauper from Sheffield) and Brooks (a disabled woman 15 years older than Saxton from Middleton-by-Wirksworth), neither of whom had previously met, were forcibly married by the Middleton authorities in an attempt to shift the costs of Brooks's care off the books of Middleton and onto the books of Sheffield; the issue was one of fraud, not of paternity.

Incidentally, QI is never a reliable source; the majority of their content comes straight from Wikipedia, often verbatim. (They do admit to this, but the disclaimer is always buried in the small print somewhere.) – iridescent 12:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Knobstick wedding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004212950/http://www.ihgs.ac.uk/news/pdf/IHGS%20Newsletter%20143_107.pdf to http://www.ihgs.ac.uk/news/pdf/IHGS%20Newsletter%20143_107.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]