Talk:Knights Plaza
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Knights Plaza article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Knights Plaza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090711183759/http://www.housing.ucf.edu:80/communitiesdetail.php?community=towers12 to http://www.housing.ucf.edu/communitiesdetail.php?community=towers12
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Changes on 18 May 2016
[edit]I undid the changes made by @Ucfccmarketing: as they had several problems:
- Contradicting the specified source (e.g., changing apartment contract length from "annual" to "11 month".
- Unsourced changes. Yes, much of the current article is unsourced, and should also be examined - but that is not an excuse to make things worse.
- Puffery. Phrases such as "will make the area more pedestrian friendly" and "retail spaces currently available which will be filled within the coming year".
I also have some general concerns:
- The original user name (now blocked) was Ucfccmarketing. This leads me to believe there may be a conflict of interest. If so, any non-trivial changes should be requested on the talk page, not made directly to the article.
- The changes were marked as "m" (minor). See WP:MINOR to see why this should not have been done.