Talk:Knife fight

Icepick grip was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 April 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Knife fight. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Knife fight article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Blades (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blades, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BladesWikipedia:WikiProject BladesTemplate:WikiProject BladesBlades articles

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

Military history: Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improving this page

Diagrams/photos describing the grips would greatly aid the descriptions.

Also some mention of the various schools of thoughts regarding target cutting areas, and the implications of.

A legal section, describing laws regarding offensive and defensive actions with knives would be handy too.

Images would be a definite plus. I don't think a legal section would work - a fight involving use of deadly objects would be governed by the same laws if the objects were knives, rocks, bats, or stiletto heels. There's a difference if it's a gun. bd2412 T 04:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page is pretty damn awful. Basically nothing more than nerdy film references. How about some actual real world info? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.216.151 (talk) 14:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any thoughts on dumping the Pop culture section? I really adds nothing to the understanding of the topic.--Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 19:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Knife fights and useage in the military or similar; for rappelling, etc. E.g. Navy Seals in the Gulf of Aden, stabbing a Somali pirate. David Bellavia in Fallujah. WW2 and WW1; all kinds of instances. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.110.212.119 (talk) 08:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

why does this exist?

.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I deleted the dead link to the archive - https://web.archive.org/web/20110114231341/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ Because this link leads to an article of Major Rex Applegate who in his article only mentions the Infantry Journal, December 1943. While the very article of this man we can not consider as a reliable source. If my colleague provides the original of the article in 1943, we will be able to study it and after that make a conclusion about the reliability of the link to the web archive I remind you that in Wikipedia we are not interested in personal opinion, we are interested in verifiable facts and reliable sources. Jonncornerr (talk) 20:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Jonncornerr[reply]

Hurt? ...I don’t want to get hurt AverageLemonDemonEnthusiast (talk) 11:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]