Talk:Knanaya/version 2

Following is the original talk page of this article . This was not moved when the article was recently moved from Knanaua to Knanaya

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Knanaua

Reasons for the POV is explained in the talk page. All the POV's were removed with out any reason/explanation/discussion multiple times since July 2009. What has been done in this article is just citing some book names for all the creative statements. The POV is for the reason that this fiction article cite well known authors book as reference for each creative statement. NO SUCH STATEMENTS EXIST IN THE BOOKS CITED.

Give some justifications before you wrongly quote all the books with most stupid stories and repeatedly mess the article and remove the POV. EasoPothen (talk) 05:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding kanaya thommen also read from a syric study note have given in a college that In the year 345 A.D Thomas of cana, an Edessan merchant, came to malabar with 472 families of Mesopotomain Christians. The king assigned to Thomas and his followers extensive lands near his Capital city and they settled down there. Unfortunately there arose a split among the colonists, 400 families standing as one party and the rest remaining sepereate. The group of the 400 famillies settled in the northern street of the colony and the other group in the southern street Those who settled in the north were called Vadakkumbhagar and those in the south Thekkumbhagar. The Vadakkumbhagar carried on evangelization and added new christians to their community. The Thekkumbhagar did not evangelize any and remained a community distinct and isolated. The arrival of these colonists increased the prestige and strength of the malabar church. The racial admixture and social contact of the indian christians with the foreign race served to improve their quality and to better their political, social and economic status. And many do mention that they came in malabar because of persecution in those west asian land. that when chrisitaniy became popular. Rome tried to make it underthem. whoever did not accept got killed or ranaway from those places. So these can be the reason for all immigraions to malabar.

All these fiction stories are nice to hear. Any evidences. There is not even a tradition recorded in 16th century to support this EasoPothen (talk) 06:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]