Talk:Knüffeln

A fact from Knüffeln appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 May 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the top trumps in Knüffeln, the centuries-old national card game of Frisia, are the five "Old Ones"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Knüffeln.

Wikipedia

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Board and table games B‑class Mid‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ranking

If a 48 card pack is used with the "10"s removed, why do these cards appear in the box "Ranking in 'unchosen suits'"? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth:. Thank you - very well spotted. It was an error which I have now corrected. Bermicourt (talk) 12:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Heart 8/9

With the correction of the mistake in Bernhardt the image of the 5 old ones should also be replaced. --Jonas kork (talk) 07:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I'll also reference the remark. Bermicourt (talk) 10:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]