Talk:Kluane (disambiguation)
Appearance
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move 25 September 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
– an electoral district is NOT a primary topic. SenoritaGomez (talk) 09:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: as mentioned below, Kluane is an article with significant content and must also be renamed to make way for the first proposed page move. This request has been altered to reflect that fact. The nom may withdraw this request, change the second "new" page title to something else, or leave it as it is now. P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 19:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: if you were to perform this move only, it would replace the electoral district article with this disambiguation page, i.e. the electoral district article would be lost. You need to include a move of that article too, otherwise this request will be closed as malformed. See multi-page move. HandsomeFella (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Weak oppose: why is the electoral district not the primary topic (of the entries on the dab page)? It appears to be the only one actually and simply called "Kluane" (there may be other things just called Kluane but apparently not in Wikipedia). The park is by far the most commonly-accessed page of those listed, but I fail to see any evidence that it is commonly referred to as just Kluane, hence why would people expect to reach it simply as "Kluane"? I did find two wikilinks to Kluane intending Kluane Lake and one for the park (I fixed these since they are currently wrong and would still be wrong if they reached a dab page) amongst the many linking for the electoral district. There are occasional references to Kluane as a vague region in that part of Yukon but there doesn't seem to be any formal location other than the park, lake, and electoral district. It seems that there is little or nothing to be gained by this change. We already have an unambiguous article at Kluane and we have a hatnote to a dab page here for other uses. The proposal would send everyone to the dab page, hardly an improvement unless it can be shown that a majority of people reaching Kluane wanted to be somewhere else. Lithopsian (talk) 19:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.