Talk:Klondike Trail

Canada: Alberta / Yukon / History / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian Territories.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Mining

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hiking trails (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hiking trails, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Hiking trailsWikipedia:WikiProject Hiking trailsTemplate:WikiProject Hiking trailsHiking trails articles

Requesting a review

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am new at this, and have rewritten this article with new sources. I would like to request a review. Is it still a stub?— Preceding unsigned comment added by MissusK (talk • contribs)

I don't think having the stub tags on the page would hurt much, but it does seem more extensive, so I've removed the tags. Huon (talk) 15:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c) Hey MissusK. A very nice job. Transparent, properly attributed sourcing! Thank you. We desperately need more new editors like you—people actually here to write out of intellectual goals and curiosity (and who have the ability to do so effectively), rather than the inundation we are currently experiencing of (often semi-literate, shameless) people, here to promote their businesses.

It's not an exact science and I'd say it's somewhat on the bubble but I think removing the stub tags would be fine and is warranted given the encyclopedic content you've added. The short definition of a stub is an article that "although providing some useful information, is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject". I think it's fair to say this "provide[s] encyclopedic coverage of [the] subject" now, despite that it could be significantly expanded. Please go ahead.

One tip: on talk page like this one, as well as noticeboards and other behind the scenes places where editors are talking to each other (but never in articles), you should sign your posts. This is done by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post, which automatically formats as your signature with a time/date stamp when you save the page (as an example, you'll see my signature at the end of this post). The tildes can also be added with the signature button that you should see above the edit window, and which will look either like or . Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:34, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both so much! This is quite intimidating, but gratifying too. I may potentially add to the above, but need to borrow some books from the library... Thanks again. I really appreciate your support and assistance. --MissusK (talk) 15:56, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prudens crossing

Does anyone know where Prudens crossing is located? Is it now known as Holmes Crossing? 2001:56A:FCE3:2E00:DC98:F707:3E62:B55D (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]