Talk:Klobiodon

Palaeontology: Pterosaurs Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pterosaurs task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Klobiodon is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hi. I'm the author buuuuut I think it'd be a a little egotistical to go about it so just wondering if someone could include a little bit of the extra detail from the description. (MOS1985 (talk) 19:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

@MOS1985: Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest; the most relevant section is WP:SELFCITE) doesn't address taxonomists writing about taxa they've described, but you wouldn't be the first to do so. This article could certainly use a morphological description. It should not be a problem if you would like to add a description yourself. I don't think it would be at all egotistical; it might be egotistical if you were focused on creating new articles on taxa you've named when so many taxa named by other people lack articles, but an improving an article started by somebody else can only be a good thing. Plantdrew (talk) 22:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]