Talk:Klaus Quaet-Faslem
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by K.e.coffman (talk · contribs) on 12 April 2017 with the comment: #REDIRECT List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (Q) -- pls see Talk It was contested by Icewhiz (talk · contribs) on 2017-04-23 with the comment: Undid revision 775027163 by K.e.coffman (talk) notable ace |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Klaus Quaet-Faslem article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions. Successful completion of missions is not part of SOLDIER. Did not hold a significant command.
No de.wiki article exists, but is equally unconvincing for notability. Please also see a note at MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients are being redirected to alphabetical lists. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Notable due to his status as a Flying ace with a high claimed kills counts. As you can see in List of World War II flying aces - flyers with a much smaller kill count have articles - with the notability being their kill count and nothing else. Being an aerial ace (with a significant count for a particular conflict - 5 would be borderline for WWII, but would confer significance in any other conflict - mid-double digits and up for WWII is clearly significant). notable per SOLDIER: " Played an important role in a significant military event such as a major battle or campaign" - kill counts of these magnitude are a significant material and personnel (aviation - expensive to train) advantage. Soviets were competitive in the air from the end of 1942 and onward - and in event taking out a regiment sized enemy force - Aviation regiment (Soviet Union) single handed is significant regardless of opposition quality. The high kill count of the top German aviators was just due to enemy opposition - but because they kept on flying combat ops (as opposed to being tasked to training / command) - until they died / severely wounded / war ended - this was detrimental to the German effort on a strategic level, but on a personal level allowed very skilled pilots to shine (gaining significant experience and improving beyond the level of other forces with a saner personnel mgmt strategy).Icewhiz (talk) 11:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Start-Class biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aerospace biography articles
- Aerospace biography task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Start-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles