Talk:Kix (band)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kix (band) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia page stolen for website?
[edit]Rocklahoma is using this content on their site without citing it came from Wikipedia (they're probably also using it on print media), which I'm sure is against the GFDL. I don't know who to contact about letting them know this...
Ziggy the Hamster (talk) 19:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm on it, Ziggy. I'll post it to the Administrators' noticeboard; someone there will know how to deal with it. Thanks for your concern. Cheers! SunDragon34 (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
If they already have the content why are we keeping our users from seeing what we have on this site, forcing them to see information about my favorite 80's band from their site. Have you ever heard of closing the barn door after the cows have gotten out? We should put the information back up and get them to cease and desist using it. (Aethercracker (talk) 02:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC))
It's in the administrator's noticeboard archives now... Aethercracker, I will say that Wikipedia never lost the content (if we did, it was a vandal?).. it's just kind of stupid that they'll go and print this and put it on their site and tout it like it's their content when it's not as far as I can tell (I'll shut up when it's proven they contributed to Wikipedia and then used the content on their site). I put up a notice on the mirrors and forks page, but it looks like it never got taken care of... WP:Mirrors_and_forks/Pqr#Rocklahoma.com - Ziggy the Hamster (talk) 03:45, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Neutrality issues
[edit]Love the band, but the writing here looks like it came from a publicist.
A few examples:
""Kix Are for Kids" creatively merged the name of the band..." The word 'creatively' is far to subjective for the sentence.
"Kix, Baltimore's favorite hard rock band garnered quite a reputation for themselves as one of Maryland's most exciting live cover bands..."
Awful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirinprof (talk • contribs) 21:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Added a neutrality tag indicating cleanup is needed. Article language is not neutral and appears plagerized from subject's promotional materials. Needs heavy editing to meet POV quality standards. BenKetchum (talk) 03:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kix (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141223033649/http://www.guitar.com/articles/kix-interview-brian-%E2%80%9Cdamage%E2%80%9D-forsythe-celebrates-return-kix to http://guitar.com/articles/kix-interview-brian-%E2%80%9Cdamage%E2%80%9D-forsythe-celebrates-return-kix
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013110129/http://www.sleazeroxx.com/interviews/younkins.shtml to http://www.sleazeroxx.com/interviews/younkins.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)