Talk:Kitsap Fast Ferries/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Adityavagarwal (talk · contribs) 04:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Glad to pick it up for a review! 
- Catamaran is a duplink, so that has to be removed.
- It's rather far from the first link and in an entirely new section about the vessels. I think it's worth keeping.
- "in the U.S. state of Washington" Do we need to mention "in the U.S. state of"?
- Yes, since Washington is often confused with the national capital of Washington, D.C.
- "and early 20th" perhaps add a "the" in the middle?
- The "the" before "late 19th century" carries over.
- Link Seattle, Bremerton, Southworth, and Vashon in body.
- Done.
- Do we know whom the 400 passengerfeery was leased?
- The company isn't notable, so I added a generic description.
- Link Kingston in body.
- Done.
- Also explain foil-assisted in brackets.
- It is explained in the next sentence.
- There should be a hyphen in "low wake" in the Vessels section? The lead has it.
- Only in the second instance.
- Link King County.
- Already linked (as King County Dept. of Transportation).
- @Adityavagarwal: Ready for a check. SounderBruce 05:05, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- [[user:SounderBruce|SounderBruce}} Looks yet another interesting article. Goodto go! Adityavagarwal (talk) 10:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.