Talk:Kitefin shark/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am reviewing this article for GA. It is excellent in every way. I have read it through several times for enjoyment.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Clearly and concisely written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS guidelines

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Comprehensively referenced b (citations to reliable sources): References are to reliable sources c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Covers the major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations! (Only question is why is it called "kitefin"?)

Thanks! I have no idea why it's called the kitefin shark. -- Yzx (talk) 19:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

—Mattisse (Talk) 19:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)