Talk:Kirkleatham

A fact from Kirkleatham appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 August 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Kirkleatham's Owl and Endangered Species Centre is home to one of Britain's largest collections of owls?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/August.

Wikipedia

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Kirkleatham is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Population

Whilst I agree that including a population figure is desirable, this number is misleading. For a start there are only a couple of dozen dwellings in the village so 7,045 wildly over-estimates the actual inhabitants. Secondly, this electoral ward is part of Redcar and is included in the population figure on that page. Thirdly, the village of Kirkleatham is not actually in Kirkleatham ward - it's in Dormanstown ward, so residents would be included in Dormanstown's figure! I therefore propose to remove the statistic completely. Skrcppr (talk) 02:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kirkleatham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100721000007/http://www.apollo-magazine.com/march-2006/80236/assetstripping.thtml to http://www.apollo-magazine.com/march-2006/80236/assetstripping.thtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kirkleatham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]