Talk:Kirby Corporation
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kirby Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140330050922/http://www.kirbycorp.com/1_corp/officers.cfm to http://www.kirbycorp.com/1_corp/officers.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
G11
[edit]@Bbb23: What is your objection to the speedy deletion? QuicoleJR (talk) 21:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- It's not tough to figure out; I don't think the article is so promotional that it would require a rewrite. Actually, I don't think it's promotional at all, although it could use some work. I also don't think you're sufficiently experienced to be tagging articles for speedy deletion. Why are you so interested in articles with "Kirby" anyway? It's kind of odd.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- All fair points. I think an {{advert}} tag would suffice. I put "promotional" because it uses promotional language and peacock prose. As for the Kirby thing, I'm a fan of the video games and figured I'd check out the disambiguation page and see what was on it. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- What language do you find "promotional"?--Bbb23 (talk) 22:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- In hindsight, it really was not that promotional, although the subsidiaries section needs work, and the board section seems unnecessary. Sorry. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- What language do you find "promotional"?--Bbb23 (talk) 22:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- All fair points. I think an {{advert}} tag would suffice. I put "promotional" because it uses promotional language and peacock prose. As for the Kirby thing, I'm a fan of the video games and figured I'd check out the disambiguation page and see what was on it. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)