Talk:Kipchak language
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Confused
[edit]The dates given would appear too late for this to be the ancestor of all the Kipchak languages. Besides, we classify it as a sub-branch of Kipchak, so it can't be the ancestor if the class'n is correct. — kwami (talk) 06:11, 4 March 2013 (UTC)