Talk:Kingswear Castle/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 13:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard of this one, so I may as well find out now... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toolbox checks -- no dab or EL issues.

Prose/structure -- my usual copyedit but no further concerns unless you feel I broke something.

Detail -- succinct, but I think reasonable for GA-level.

Referencing -- nothing leapt out re. reliability or formatting.

Images -- licensing checks out; my only suggestion is that it seems a shame to render these nice pics at the default size, I'd have thought the infobox photo (and map) could easily be say 280px, and the 1880 pic could get away with an upright factor of 1.2 or 1.3; just a thought...

Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Ian. I've upped the size of the info box images as suggested, and increased the 1880 pic to 1.2 upright. Hchc2009 (talk) 07:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay tks -- was mainly leaving it open to ensure no issues with my copyedit so passing now. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]