Jump to content

Talk:Kingdom of Tambapanni

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Language

[edit]

Was'nt the languge at that time a form of Prakrit not yet formed into Sinhala yet ? Taprobanus (talk) 19:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure, I'd have to do some more research on that. Thanks for that.--Blackknight12 (talk) 23:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK the best collection of articles about Sinhala language is
Gair, James (1998). Studies in South Asian Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509521-9. I have a copy of it. It says Insular Prakrit-> Sinhala Parkrit -> Archaic Sinhala -> Modern Sinhala. But essentially he is one of the experts of Sinhala language. On a different note, this kingdom is only known from literature that is Mahvamsa is the only known primary source for its existence. So the article has to make it clear that we have no archaeological evidence of this kingdom. But we do have archeological evidence of people living and trading in area that Mahavamsa says that this kingdom once existed. It has to be treated more like a legendary kingdom that was written about after 900 years of its existence. That is a long time to remember details via oral history alone isn’t it ? Lot of modern historians have speculated about this legendary Kingdom that I have some books on that I can add to it when I get time. It is also interesting that the Sanskrit term Tamirvarni which seemed to have been Prakritised to Tambapanni is used across the Palk Straights on both sides one for a river and another for a region, kind of alluding Indo Aryan speaking traders trading and settlement patterns in South India and Sri Lanka at that time. Anyway when I have time I will add it for what ever it is worth. Taprobanus (talk) 22:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
About the language if you have the sources then go ahead and please add it but im not sure about giving this kingdom and giving it the status of legendary, that could probably be debatable, however you do have a point.--Blackknight12 (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kingdom of Tambapanni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kingdom of Tambapanni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The map in the info box on this page appears to be a fantasy map. Yakshas and nagas are mythical creatures in Hindu/Buddhist mythology/folklore. Brusquedandelion (talk) 09:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is really not appropriate. There is no evidence outside of these myths written centuries later that there existed people on the island going by these Indo-Aryan names of mythical creatures. Metta79 (talk) 17:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the map to a previous revision without these mythical kingdoms and updated the legend accordingly. Brusquedandelion (talk) 17:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]