Talk:Kingdom of Lindsey

Lincolnshire High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms High‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Two seemingly conflicting etymologies are given for the name of the Kingdom. Can anyone clear this up? ♪♫Kvi lle 105 125♫♪

Untitled

A picture of this area would be quite helpful... JJohnson1701

sorted. Hel-hama (talk) 19:21, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are preferred for additions but especially for edits

Just rollbacked an edit of - "The kingdom of Lindsey or Linnuis (Old English) - ". No edit summary. If you have something to add it will always be appreciated but sources (WP:RS) that explain your reasoning are preferred. Descriptive edit summaries, while not required, are very useful (again, we'll all know what your reasoning is). AnonNep (talk) 09:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was a trivial style fix: Template:Lang#Italics says "{{lang|LanguageCode|...}} outputs plain text, while {{lang-LanguageCode|...}} templates (e.g. {{lang-de}}) output text in italics". I just converted the lead to the form preferred wikiwide. We want foreign language text in italics as per MOS:Ety and the right way to get it is by using the above-mentioned template appropriately. --Omnipaedista (talk) 12:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foot?

Sarah Foot's opinion is cited, but no work of hers. It would be best to have her opinion cited to her work. Srnec (talk) 20:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kingdom of Lindsey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070720073804/http://www.aschart.kcl.ac.uk/content/charters/text/s1183.html to http://www.aschart.kcl.ac.uk/content/charters/text/s1183.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]