Talk:King Tornado football
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from King Tornado football appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 18:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the King Tornado football team once won by a score of 206–0 – without even playing the full game? Source: Bristol Herald Courier (game was only 48 minutes against the regular 60)
** ALT1: ... that King Tornado football team once won a game by a score of 206–0? Source: same
** ALT2: ... that a sportswriter became "so bored" by the King Tornado football team's "beatdown" of their opponent that he stopped recording statistics? Source: same
Moved to mainspace by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/King Tornado football; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Well it's new enough, long enough, I don't see any copyvios. The sourcing is a bit meager but I think it suffices for the purpose. User:BeanieFan11, I do wonder about the "affiliation"--you list them as "Independent", but that first stint was with that Bristol association. Can you clarify? As for the hook--I'll take the regular one, but that entire thing is just one hook after another. EVERY PLAYER ON THE TEAM SCORED A TD? Surely that's a record. Anyway, clear up the affiliation, do a review, and off to the front page you go. Drmies (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Thanks for the review. I added a QPQ. As for the affiliation, the Bristol association wasn't the league that they were part of, it just seems to have been a local athletic club that supported / sponsored the team. On reflection, I don't think it is important enough to mention a one-year sponsorship so I removed the mention of it. Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 04:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)