Talk:King Rollo Films
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move proposal
[edit]I propose that the title of this article be changed from "King Rollo Films Ltd" to "King Rollo Films".
I think this would be a good idea, as this seems to be how they style their name these days (see their website). Also, Wikipedia naming convention says that the legal suffix of a company should not generally be used in an article title.
I think this is the right thing to do, and don't mind conducting the move myself, but I just wanted to see if I could get consensus first. --Danjewell (talk) 12:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Okay I've given this enough time now. I prefer to reach consensus before doing things like renaming articles, so if no-one objects I'll rename this article later this evening. --Danjewell (talk) 17:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- Stub-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Animated films articles
- Low-importance Animated films articles
- Animated films work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class film articles
- Stub-Class British cinema articles
- British cinema task force articles
- Stub-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- Unknown-importance Animated films articles
- WikiProject Film articles