Talk:King George VI Memorial Chapel/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: APK (talk · contribs) 07:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've had plenty of GA reviews done, but this will be my first time reviewing. I plan on looking over this in the next day or two. APK hi :-) (talk) 07:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would link "buttresses" and "quire" because they may be unfamiliar terms to some readers.
- Done
Robin Woods and Dean of Windsor are linked twice.
- Done
The architectural style in the infobox says modernist, but no mention of that is made in the article.
- Removed, it is apparent from sight, but uncited.
Is there a way to update the cost inflation? I don't know if that's a template issue.
- I believe it sporadically updates.
Suggestion to link "royal family" as well.
- Done
"Knights of the Garter" and "Order of the Garter" both link to the same article. Is the first related to Military Knights of Windsor or is there a section on Order of the Garter where that topic is covered?
- Linked to Military Knights of Windsor, their article says they give support at garter events
The Commons link doesn't take the reader directly to the category.
- I think it does now
The inscriptions should have a reference after "reads:"
- Regretfully removed inscriptions as uncited
Earwig's check looks fine.
I would expand the lead a bit. Maybe mention a few facts from the history and design sections, so it's not only two lines.

Thanks for writing the article. It was very informative. APK hi :-) (talk) 08:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@No Swan So Fine: It's been 12 days. Did you want to withdraw the nomination or finish it? APK hi :-) (talk) 00:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll finish it now! No Swan So Fine (talk) 22:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the suggested changes No Swan So Fine (talk) 14:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@No Swan So Fine: Oh those inscriptions were a great addition to the article. I just thought you had a source to back it up. Let's look around for one. APK hi :-) (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's one for the second inscription. APK hi :-) (talk) 16:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@No Swan So Fine: I re-added the second inscription with a source. Did you ever find one for Princess Margaret? If not, we can go ahead and wrap up this nom. APK hi :-) (talk) 04:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much - I was unable to find one for Margaret, alas, but I imagine there will probably be printed reference in the next few years. Thank you so much for all your help. No Swan So Fine (talk) 14:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.