Talk:King Arthur's Great Halls

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

King Arthur Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject King Arthur, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of King Arthur, the Arthurian era and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.King ArthurWikipedia:WikiProject King ArthurTemplate:WikiProject King ArthurKing Arthur articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Current use of King Arthur's Hall

King Arthur's Hall is currently in use by the The Fellowship of the Knights of the Round Table of King Arthur as per the web page of the organization. I will update the wiki entry to reflect this. Cassius235 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:10, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Masons

I really can't see why the masons using the centre, or the nearest preceptory centre being in Launceston is in any way notable or relevant. ----Snowded ^TALK 04:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To add to that point - who else uses the hall? Is who uses it notable in any way? The article passes that test for its origins. Why is its use by the Masons special in any way? Is it linked to the history of the building? ----Snowded ^TALK 11:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be getting confused. The building is currently owned by King Arthur Lodge of Freemasons and has been used as a Masonic hall since 1951, in a partnership with the local tourist association, they have developed part of the building as a tourist attraction. The point I was making about the Knights Templar's is relevant, as there are scenes on the walls in the inner chamber of the hall depicting scenes of Knight Templar's in battle. Thus the building, and especially the Great Hall, was build for such a body to use, hence it it strange that the nearest Preceptory of Knight Templars is based not in Tintagel, but in Launceston. To answer your question as to who else uses the building, simple, nobody as the building is mainly a masonic hall Yummy Dunn (talk) 13:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I strill dont think its relevant, but its a "mostly ,~~harmful~~ harmless" addition. So despite your edit warring I will leave it, but I have deleted the final sentence. That needs a third party source to establish that its notable, not a web site which announces its is a work in progress. Read WP:RS ----Snowded ^TALK 23:28, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's not harmful, per se, but it is editorializing, which we don't allow either. I would also point out that that the association with Royal Arch and installations is irrelevant to a general reader, for whom "Masonic" is instantly more recognizable. MSJapan (talk) 02:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Typo there (corrected), reference to Hitchhikers Guide. If its an article about a building, then the origins of the building are of interest - like the origins of place names etc. Its less clear that current use is notable, regardless of if a name is recognisable. --Snowded ^TALK 03:56, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King Arthur's Hall, Tintagel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120527080917/http://www.tintagelweb.co.uk/King%20Arthurs%20Great%20Halls2.htm to http://www.tintagelweb.co.uk/King%20Arthurs%20Great%20Halls2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]