Talk:King's Theatre, Glasgow

King's Theatre Pantomime was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 April 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into King's Theatre, Glasgow. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

King's Theatre Pantomime was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 7 April 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into King's Theatre, Glasgow. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Reconsider Tagging

The article has been cleaned up somewhat recently, would it be possible for someone to reconsider the tagging the page currently has?. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.210.58.2 (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality Dispute?

This article is tageed as possibly not neutral. Can anyone explain the reasoning of this as I can find no discussion? Adamcobb 19:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged it as not NPOV, meant to do the reasoning and then got distracted and forgot. Basically there are a lot of peacock terms, and it's written from a fairly 'oh it's a brilliant theatre' POV - this may well be the case, but it needs to be objective. It's also fairly chatty in parts. Will2710 22:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I came across this while browsing, saw the tags, so have been bold and had a go at a rewrite to remove many of the peacock words and to make it more NPOV. Hope I've not upset anyone - perhaps the tags can be removed? Comments welcome. Smalljim 17:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's Theatre, Glasgow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008200353/http://www.howlovely.co.uk/360/kings/java/kings.html to http://www.howlovely.co.uk/360/kings/java/kings.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]