Talk:King's-Edgehill School

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Nova Scotia / Education Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Canada.

Fair use rationale for Image:Kings-Edgehill logo.png

Image:Kings-Edgehill logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

I have assessed this article as a "Low" priority for the Schools Project. There are some fairly extraordinary claims made in this article, and provided the school's history is fleshed out more and that they are backed up by reliable sources, this article could be given a higher priority within the project. If substantial improvements are made to this article, especially in terms of referencing, please request a reassessment. Best of luck editing!LonelyBeacon (talk) 20:13, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Table of Contents?

Is there any particular reason why this article has the NOTOC (No Table of Contents) markup? I think it would be easier to navigate with a Table of Contents. --Muzilon (talk) 05:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of any response, I have boldly removed the NOTOC markup.--Muzilon (talk) 22:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Curtis?

@Jhtraining: I note you have deleted the name of Bruce Curtis from the list of Notable Alumni without explanation. Do you think the list should only include famous (as opposed to "infamous") alumni?--Muzilon (talk) 05:49, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

students...

An IP contributor, 129.100.255.23, who has been making a series of questionable edits, added a redlink to an unknown NN individual, without any explanation as to why they velonged in King's-Edgehill School#Students. I have no objection to redlinks, per se. I support the adding of relinks -- when the redlink is to a topic that credibly could be a standalone article. This is what our wikidocument and longstanding conventions support. But, when I googled the individual they added there was no indication they were references to support that they would ever measure up to our inclusion criteris.

So I removed them. Geo Swan (talk) 23:45, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]