This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:50, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
To Brad101, Do you have a precise book than a book by the Japanese publishing company and Japanese Navy's official documents? You should show grounds to assume that it is not correct about an official document by the Japanese Navy.Mystia Lorelei (talk) 09:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Brad's rating does not assume that any of the information is neccesarily incorrect. But rather that there are gaps in the coverage (what were these ships specifically used for, where did they sail, in what circumstances did they enter and leave service, are there any details of the design to be discussed, can some of the tabulated information be converted to prose, one was sunk but by whom, in what circumstances?) and that not a single point of information is actually cited, while your references do not have specific page numbers. Brad's assessment seems correct according to our rating guidelines at WP:SHIPS. Benea (talk) 10:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
