Talk:Kinderhook plates

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kinderhook plates article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Latter Day Saint movement Mid‑importance

	Latter Day Saint movement portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal Mid‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Joseph Smith section

The recent edits adding the quote from History of the Church as the first part of that section is highly POV, especially in the attempt to cite that quote as explicitly coming from Joseph Smith Jr. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 18:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some changes which should help with NPOV & also inserted an inline cite of who is making a particular claim. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 19:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a prophet or not as a prophet

I removed “Furthermore there is evidence that Joseph Smith didn't act in prophet's role during translation of Kinderhook plates” added by anonymous user (79.209.48.198) and the reference added by (208.81.184.4).

The sentence and reference are immaterial and confusing. Most readers do not recognize Joseph Smith as a prophet or understand the complicated implications of what it means to “act in a prophet’s role” or not act in a prophet’s role in Latter-day Saint culture.

The anonymous users who added the information most likely want to present different alternatives to Joseph Smith’s involvement with the plates than what some critics of Smith proclaim. The Deseret News article isn’t the answer. Wait until something is published that reaches deeper. The result may end up the same but Rhett Wilkinson’s article doesn’t add value.

I think most can agree that the Kinderhook plates were a modern creation, Joseph Smith intended a translation, either revelatory or by traditional means, and there is no existing text derived by Joseph from the plates. It seems unwise to defend or attack something that isn’t there.

Matthew R. Lee 03:56, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

I merely formatted & completed the citation added by 79.209.48.198 (dif). -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 22:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kinderhook plates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130415102803/http://mormonwiki.org/Kinderhook_plates to http://mormonwiki.org/Kinderhook_plates

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to remove History of the Church section, or at least move it to a footnote

The History of the Church is NOT a reliable source. I'd like to place the following section into a footnote, but realize this might be controversial, so am presenting the idea here for discussion:

The History of the Church also states Smith said the following:[11]
I have translated a portion of [the plates] and find they contain the history of the person with whom they were found. He was a descendant of Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom from the ruler of heaven and earth.
Stanley B. Kimball says the statement found in History of the Church could have been an altered version of William Clayton's statement, placing Smith in the first person.[12] Diane Wirth, writing in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon (2:210), states: "A first-person narrative was apparently a common practice of this time period when a biographical work was being compiled. Since such words were never penned by the Prophet, they cannot be uncritically accepted as his words or his opinion".[13]

Epachamo (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source for the History of the Church citation is from the journal of Joseph Smith's personal secretary, William Clayton, and thus constitutes a reliable source. Kornbelt888 (talk) 23:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Kinderhook plates and their metaphysical translation by Joseph Smith are part of LDS/Mormon history ConnieBland (talk) 07:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unreadable image/document

Image attached https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ec/Kinderhook_Plates_Broadside.gif to the entry is unreadable ConnieBland (talk) 07:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]