Talk:Kinderen voor Kinderen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Re paragraph suggesting racial bias

I much appreciate J73's extensive contribution of new material but have nonetheless pulled the following one paragraph, pending improvement. It needs fewer subjective judgements and more specifics and verifiable references. Where/when/in what mainstream medium did Ronald Snijders say the words attributed to him? Ditto for "one reviewer" (who, exactly?). Who says that Snijders represents "the stronger voices in the actual communities"? "A few coloured faces were spotted": who did this counting and spotting when? Also, it is overlinked. To me it seems unnecessary to link to "criticism", "first hand", "communities", or "antidote"; to link to "Surinam" twice; and to link to "choir" again. On the other hand, why not link "flautist"? And there must be a better term than "white-faced" (which links to a disambiguation page listing various animal species).

NB; that's not the only hint of criticism pointed at the choir; although a few coloured faces were spotted since the early days, and album 5 featured songs about first hand racism and colonialism, the stronger voices in the actual communities were not impressed. Surinam-born flautist Ronald Snijders was quoted "If they ask me I'll write them a Surinam-flavoured song". Instead he released his own album of children's songs with one reviewer branding it an antidote for "the white-faced Kinderen voor Kinderen".

--IslandGyrl 02:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KvK logo 2.png

Image:KvK logo 2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This supplementary logo is not essential and strictly speaking is indeed probably not covered by fair use, as the main logo Image:KvK logo.png suffices to identify the subject. As the original uploader I therefore concur with the deletion of this second logo image. -- IslandGyrl 09:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kinderen voor Kinderen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216110158/http://www.popinstituut.nl/biografie/kinderen_voor_kinderen.482.html to http://www.popinstituut.nl/biografie/kinderen_voor_kinderen.482.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Complete lack of references

This article contains a bunch of outdated and contentious information that should really be referenced, and yet this article contains literally only two refs. According to WP:BLP we must remove poorly sourced material on sight, which would pretty much mean deleting almost the entire article. I thought I'd consult other Wikipedians before taking such a drastic measure. ―JochemvanHees (talk) 09:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]